2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Laser Diffraction for Quantification of Protein Aggregates: Comparison With Resonant Mass Measurement, Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, Flow Imaging, and Light Obscuration

Abstract: In the past, analysis of micron-sized (>1.0 μm) aggregates of therapeutic proteins has been limited to light obscuration (LO), and appropriate quantitative methods of evaluating protein aggregates need to be developed. Recently, novel methods with enhanced reliability and sensitivity, such as nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), resonant mass measurement (RMM), and flow imaging (FI), have emerged. We have found that quantitative laser diffraction (qLD) is also effective for quantitative evaluation of protein … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Similar to literature reports on SMPs 28,46 and as discussed earlier for the shared protein control, NTA resulted in overall higher particle concentration than RMM. Although the particle concentration between the methods were orders of magnitude different, a weak positive correlation exists between the 2 techniques (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.39, p ¼ 0.006, Table 1), indicating a link between the outcomes from these 2 techniques.…”
Section: Submicron Particle Analysis On Late-phase Clinical and Commesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…3). Similar to literature reports on SMPs 28,46 and as discussed earlier for the shared protein control, NTA resulted in overall higher particle concentration than RMM. Although the particle concentration between the methods were orders of magnitude different, a weak positive correlation exists between the 2 techniques (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.39, p ¼ 0.006, Table 1), indicating a link between the outcomes from these 2 techniques.…”
Section: Submicron Particle Analysis On Late-phase Clinical and Commesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For the present study, we conducted a qLD analysis of mAb aggregates, which enabled estimation of the distribution of aggregates across a broad range of sizes, including submicron-sized aggregates. 24,42 Further studies using different types of samples and using other analytical methods such as resonance mass measurement and nanoparticle tracking analysis will be necessary to estimate the characteristics and amounts of submicron-sized particles sufficient to activate FcgRs and to confirm the risk of unintended immune cell activation caused by submicron-sized mAb aggregates. In addition, it should be considered that soluble oligomers and nanometer-sized particles could activate FcgRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Quantitative laser diffraction (qLD) has been reported to measure a wide range of 0.3-20 µm sizes, which is wider than the size range measured by RMM and NTA. 25,30 Table 1 summarizes the submicron aggregate quantification methods RMM, NTA, qLD, and 3D-HLD. Compared to the other methods, NTA can quantify particles of smaller sizes (more than tens of nanometers), whereas qLD can quantify particles of larger sizes (0.3-20 µm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TIG aggregate stock solution was prepared as previously described. 25 Briefly, the TIG solution ejected from the Tetagam Ⓡ P syringe was diluted to 0.5 mg/mL with 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and 200 mM NaCl and was then stirred with a magnetic stirrer Magmixer MA300A…”
Section: Sample Preparation For Therapeutic Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%