2023
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative MRI by nonlinear inversion of the Bloch equations

Abstract: Purpose: Development of a generic model-based reconstruction framework for multiparametric quantitative MRI that can be used with data from different pulse sequences. Methods: Generic nonlinear model-based reconstruction for quantitative MRI estimates parametric maps directly from the acquired k-space by numerical optimization. This requires numerically accurate and efficient methods to solve the Bloch equations and their partial derivatives. In this work, we combine direct sensitivity analysis and pre-compute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to auto‐differentiating through the EPG simulations, our proposed approach reduced reconstruction time by at least an order of magnitude. Thus, we envision our approach being advantageous when differentiation through the signal simulation requires significant computation, like isochromat‐based simulations 28,62 . On the other hand, the latent signal model auto‐encoders need to be retrained for varying acquisitions and sequence parameters, whereas Bloch equation–based auto‐differentiation only requires a differentiable implementation of new sequences of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to auto‐differentiating through the EPG simulations, our proposed approach reduced reconstruction time by at least an order of magnitude. Thus, we envision our approach being advantageous when differentiation through the signal simulation requires significant computation, like isochromat‐based simulations 28,62 . On the other hand, the latent signal model auto‐encoders need to be retrained for varying acquisitions and sequence parameters, whereas Bloch equation–based auto‐differentiation only requires a differentiable implementation of new sequences of interest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques model signals with an analytic formula and then resolve the underlying tissue parameters that characterize this model, 21–26 introducing a nonlinear optimization problem that may not account for slice‐profile effects, stimulated echoes, and B1+ inhomogeneity 27 . To model these effects, more complicated techniques build the Bloch equations into the forward model and solve for the underlying parameters governing the model 28–30 but require extensive computation or approximation of gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When processing subsequences with RF pulses, a known method for reducing computational cost is to precompute each combined transition 12–14 . Computation of combined transitions were also used in another simulator, 15 image reconstruction, 16 the design of RF pulses, 17 and relaxation and exchange processes in more complex multi‐compartment models using eigenvectors of transitions 18,19,20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%