2016
DOI: 10.1142/s1793525316500011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative nonlinear embeddings into Lebesgue sequence spaces

Abstract: In this paper fundamental nonlinear geometries of Lebesgue sequence spaces are studied in their quantitative aspects. Applications of this work are a positive solution to the strong embeddability problem from $\ell_q$ into $\ell_p$ ($02$. Relevant to geometric group theory purposes, the exact $\ell_p$-compressions of $\ell_2$ are computed. Finally coarse deformation of metric spaces with property A and locally compact… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from Kalton and Randrianarivony [18] that is not almost Lipschitzly embeddable into p when p ∈ [ , ∞) and p ≠ . However it was shown by the rst author [2] that α p ( ) = for p ∈ [ , ).…”
Section: Proposition 54 (I) If a Metric Space X Is Nearly Isometricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from Kalton and Randrianarivony [18] that is not almost Lipschitzly embeddable into p when p ∈ [ , ∞) and p ≠ . However it was shown by the rst author [2] that α p ( ) = for p ∈ [ , ).…”
Section: Proposition 54 (I) If a Metric Space X Is Nearly Isometricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where in (14), as well as in (15), (16), (17) and (18) below, the expectation is with respect to ε ∈ {−1, 1} n chosen uniformly at random. Since, by Jensen's inequality,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analogue of Conjecture 1.8 for sequence spaces has a positive answer. Indeed, a combination of [14,Cor. 2.19] and [14,Cor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baudier [Ba,Corollaries 2.23 and 2.19] proved that if 0 < p < q < ∞ and q ≥ 1, then (2) s ℓq (ℓ p ) = α ℓq (ℓ p ) = max{p, 1} q (the case q = 1 was already proved in [Al,Proposition 4.1(ii)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%