When processing a crime scene, obtaining a DNA profile that can identify an individual is extremely important. However, the identification of the body fluid that the sample was obtained from could provide key information of the events that occurred. microRNA (miRNA) expression analysis is a technique that has the potential to differentiate body fluids. The presence and expression of body fluid specific miRNA would provide a fast and effective tool for progressing crime scene investigation, especially alleged sexual assault cases. Forensic case work lacks methods for identifying vaginal material, venous blood, menstrual blood and aspermatozoic seminal fluid within samples. A large screening study followed by a 31 day study on five female volunteers was performed utilising RT-qPCR on a large panel of body fluid markers. Screening showed a selection of markers were suitable to differentiate each body fluid, in some cases however, expression fluctuated when analysed over a 31 day period. The data shows that hsa-miR-412 may be suitable for identifying menstrual blood, expression from markers hsa-miR-124 and hsa-miR-205 varied significantly over the 31 day period and between individuals and therefore were less suitable for body fluid identification. The data supports the use of miRNA markers for the identification of certain body fluids such as menstrual and venous blood; however markers for the identification of body fluids such as vaginal material and saliva require further investigation.
Keywords:microRNA, Body fluid identification, qPCR, Vaginal material, Menstrual cycle
IntroductionThe identification of body fluids is extremely important for progressing forensic case work. In cases of sexual assault, the identification of a body fluid can impact case level and reveal information that can support the prosecution or the defense. The capability of body fluid identification however, is limited. This is due to the non-existence of presumptive identification tests for vaginal material and aspermatozoic seminal fluid. In cases of alleged sexual assault where DNA from a victim is found on a penile swab, the identification of the body fluid present will alter case level; if a technique can differentiate between saliva and vaginal material it may support either the defense or prosecution version of events. In cases of assault where a male cannot produce semen, a DNA profile would be unlikely. If body fluid identification techniques can identify seminal fluid regardless of spermatozoa being present it may give a better understanding of the events of the case. Equally, although presumptive tests for blood are available, there are no currently used methods for differentiating between menstrual and venous blood. In cases of sexual assault, trauma blood is likely to be present, if this can be determined to be venous and not menstrual blood the context of the case would become clearer. The characterization of miRNA: short, stable, non-coding RNA's which modulate gene expression post transcription present a solution to bo...