2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative PCR for measuring biomass of decomposer fungi in planta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, since proportions of extracted gDNA from a mixed sample do not correspond necessarily to proportions of mixed biomass, results might be biased. On the other hand, there are other authors that have established methods for quantifying specific biomass based on DNA data correction with extraction yield values (Jonkers et al 2012, Song et al 2014, and even correction for substrate interference on these yields (Daly et al 2017). Here, we present a corrected method that accounts not only for inherent differences between species-specific gDNA extraction yields, but also for natural changes in mycelial composition through time, such as melanin deposition and cell wall hardening (Karakousis et al 2006), or secretion of stress-related pigments as a result of mixed culture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, since proportions of extracted gDNA from a mixed sample do not correspond necessarily to proportions of mixed biomass, results might be biased. On the other hand, there are other authors that have established methods for quantifying specific biomass based on DNA data correction with extraction yield values (Jonkers et al 2012, Song et al 2014, and even correction for substrate interference on these yields (Daly et al 2017). Here, we present a corrected method that accounts not only for inherent differences between species-specific gDNA extraction yields, but also for natural changes in mycelial composition through time, such as melanin deposition and cell wall hardening (Karakousis et al 2006), or secretion of stress-related pigments as a result of mixed culture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent studies, Song et al (2014) and Wallander et al (2013) identified two main limitations to this method: poor reproducibility in nucleic acid extraction and variation of the conversion factors used to convert genomic DNA quantities to mycelium dry weight between strains. In this study, we optimized fungal cell wall breakage before genomic DNA extraction and determined for each strain the conversion factors necessary to the conversion of genomic DNA quantity to mycelium dry weight.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in SSF, quantifying the fungal biomass is a challenge due to partial or complete adhesion of the mycelium to the solid substrate (Steudler and Bley, 2015;Wallander et al, 2013). One limitation of current biomarkers (chitin, ergosterol or phospholipid-derived fatty acids) used to determine fungal biomass is that they rely on conversion factors that vary within a single species due to environmental growth conditions or ageing (Pilgard et al, 2011;Song et al, 2014). In this study, we used the quantification of fungal genomic DNA to assess the fungal biomass during SSF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods for identifying wood fungi include isolation of fungi from degrading building timbers and identification of fungal species based on culture characteristics. Several molecular methods based on DNA analyses have been used to provide efficient, sensitive, and rapid diagnostic tools for the detection and identification of wood decay fungi without requiring a prior fungal isolation step [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%