2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative prediction of aspiration risk in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another difference between our study and the previous literature was the inclusion of patients treated with proton therapy for a sizable portion of the cohort (35%). Patients treated with protons were included in Liu et al 34 but they were only 5% of the cohort and no explicit analysis was performed using that information nor was dose analysis performed. Although radiation type was not a significant independent predictor in our study, it did serve to reduce the mean epiglottis dose from 53.7 ± 11.0 Gy for photon patients to 43.9 ± 13.6 Gy for proton patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difference between our study and the previous literature was the inclusion of patients treated with proton therapy for a sizable portion of the cohort (35%). Patients treated with protons were included in Liu et al 34 but they were only 5% of the cohort and no explicit analysis was performed using that information nor was dose analysis performed. Although radiation type was not a significant independent predictor in our study, it did serve to reduce the mean epiglottis dose from 53.7 ± 11.0 Gy for photon patients to 43.9 ± 13.6 Gy for proton patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative of VFSS based on pathological samples collected from a wide range of individuals with multiple diseases, the extraction of the most effective and valuable information from dysphagia angiography and the objective comparison of the levels of functionality within-patients before and after treatment, as well as between patients, can fully meet the comprehensive needs of scientific research, stimulate more innovative research, and generate ideas and references for the evaluation and follow-up treatment of dysphagia. For now, the quantitative analysis of VFSS is mainly used to describe the physiological state of swallowing ( 14 , 38 ), explore the pathological and physiological characteristics of swallowing in different diseases ( 23 , 39 ), analyze the effects of age, gender, texture of food balls and other factors on swallowing ( 40 , 41 ), and evaluate treatment efficacy ( 42 , 43 ). In the future, the quantitative results should be used for evaluation, and future studies should assess other valuable parameters and improve those with poor reliability, validity, and matching.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al mention that 5 years after the end of the treatment, a quarter of this category of patients will be affected by aspiration pneumonia. Tumor stage is identified as a risk factor by Liu et al; patients with ≥2 risk factors have a risk of 2.5 times more to aspire after the completion of radiotherapy treatment [36,37].…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%