2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative risk assessment of a hydrogen refueling station by using a dynamic physical model based on multi-physics system-level modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core quantitative index of quantitative risk assessment is individual risk. Individual risk refers to the individual death probability of the person whose hazard source is generated at a fixed location, which is reflected as the risk contours [ 51 , 52 ]. The calculation process of individual risk is shown in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core quantitative index of quantitative risk assessment is individual risk. Individual risk refers to the individual death probability of the person whose hazard source is generated at a fixed location, which is reflected as the risk contours [ 51 , 52 ]. The calculation process of individual risk is shown in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To more accurately measure risk, it is necessary to consider CFD-based consequence analysis complemented with quantitative risk assessment in the case of a complex system such as hybrid refueling stations [31]. At present, risk analysis of hydrogen infrastructure has been carried out with qualitative [28,[32][33][34], quantitative [7,24,35,36], and integrated methods [37][38][39][40] that include traditional risk-assessment approaches such as FMEA, HA-ZOP, and Bayesian Network models. In these approaches, two parameters are important, accident frequency and consequences, and these approaches tend to assume that risk is positively related to the probability of accidents and the severity of the consequences [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the probability of hydrogen leakage and ignition in for HRSs can be given by a bayesian method [1] , and the safety of different layouts of HRS can be analyzed based on the risk matrix method [2] . Following the similar method, the quantitative risk assessment were carried out, with respect to the design, operation and maintenance of for various HRSs [3][4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%