2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/47/473001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative strain analysis of surfaces and interfaces using extremely asymmetric x-ray diffraction

Abstract: Strain can reduce carrier mobility and the reliability of electronic devices and affect the growth mode of thin films and the stability of nanometer-scale crystals. To control lattice strain, a technique for measuring the minute lattice strain at surfaces and interfaces is needed. Recently, an extremely asymmetric x-ray diffraction method has been developed for this purpose. By employing Darwin's dynamical x-ray diffraction theory, quantitative evaluation of strain at surfaces and interfaces becomes possible. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the size of our NWs is similar across the composition range and too large to significantly broaden the XRD peaks, our data are indicative of minor lattice constant fluctuations and a disordered crystal lattice in the In x Ga 1– x P NWs. Asymmetries in the diffraction peaks may be due to the presence of dislocations, lattice strain, or fluctuations in composition within individual nanowires or within the batch. , The lattice constant of the NWs determined from the XRD measurements shifts linearly with NW composition in accordance with Vegard’s law (Figure B), which predicts such a linear relation in an ensemble measurement of a random mixture where small structural fluctuations are averaged out . The lack of significant deviations from Vegard’s law or multiple (111) peaks in the XRD spectra indicates the absence of significant phase segregation in the In x Ga 1– x P NWs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Considering that the size of our NWs is similar across the composition range and too large to significantly broaden the XRD peaks, our data are indicative of minor lattice constant fluctuations and a disordered crystal lattice in the In x Ga 1– x P NWs. Asymmetries in the diffraction peaks may be due to the presence of dislocations, lattice strain, or fluctuations in composition within individual nanowires or within the batch. , The lattice constant of the NWs determined from the XRD measurements shifts linearly with NW composition in accordance with Vegard’s law (Figure B), which predicts such a linear relation in an ensemble measurement of a random mixture where small structural fluctuations are averaged out . The lack of significant deviations from Vegard’s law or multiple (111) peaks in the XRD spectra indicates the absence of significant phase segregation in the In x Ga 1– x P NWs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, until now, mechanical stress property has not been investigated at the interface of organic optoelectronic devices because no valid method is available for detection. It is well known that interface mechanical stress plays a vital role in many failures and reliability problems (11)(12)(13)(14) of conventional inorganic optoelectronic devices and emerging perovskite solar cell and two-dimensional materials (15)(16)(17)(18). The unrevealed interface stress in organic interface directly leads to the unknown relationship between stress and device stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this equation, a characteristic matrix corresponding to the atomic layer is defined. In other words, if we desire to calculate the reflectivity of x-rays for a crystal including an irregular structure like a reconstructed semiconductor surface or strain, we can prepare the characteristic matrix corresponding to the irregular atomic layers, and then multiply this with the matrix for bulk [14].…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%