1970
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1970.tb10370.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative studies on the antagonism by naloxone of some narcotic and narcotic‐antagonist analgesics

Abstract: Summary1. Naloxone was used to study the antagonism of the analgesic effects of some narcotics (morphine sulphate, levorphanol tartrate, and methadone hydrochloride) and narcotic antagonists (pentazocine, cyclazocine, and nalorphine hydrochloride). The analgesic assay used was the mouse phenylbenzoquinone stretching test. 2. The in vivo equivalent of a pA2 value (apparent pA2) for naloxone was determined with each agonist. These values were found to be significantly larger with the narcotics than with the narc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All of the results of the interaction studies between meptazinol and naloxone support the view that the former drug's mechanism of action involves an effect at opiate receptors. Although naloxone was a more potent antagonist of responses to morphine than of those to meptazinol, this is consistent with other evidence that partial agonists are less susceptible to naloxone challenge than are opioid agonists of the morphine type (Smits & Takemori, 1970). Also, the general profile of action of meptazinol in vivo resembles that of established agonist/antagonist analgesics (Stephens et al, 1978) In contrast to the relatively consistent effects of naloxone, the action of scopolamine on responses to meptazinol differed substantially according to the antinociceptive test and species used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…All of the results of the interaction studies between meptazinol and naloxone support the view that the former drug's mechanism of action involves an effect at opiate receptors. Although naloxone was a more potent antagonist of responses to morphine than of those to meptazinol, this is consistent with other evidence that partial agonists are less susceptible to naloxone challenge than are opioid agonists of the morphine type (Smits & Takemori, 1970). Also, the general profile of action of meptazinol in vivo resembles that of established agonist/antagonist analgesics (Stephens et al, 1978) In contrast to the relatively consistent effects of naloxone, the action of scopolamine on responses to meptazinol differed substantially according to the antinociceptive test and species used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The pA2 value we obtained for the morphine-naloxone interaction in the rat colon is consistent with that found by Takemori, Kupferberg & Miller (1969), Smits & Takemori (1970) and Harris, Loh & Way (1976b) for antinociception in rodents, but slightly lower than that reported for inhibition of electrically induced contractions in the guinea-pig ileum (Kosterlitz & Watt, 1968;Vaught & Takemori, 1978;HuidobroToro et al, 1981). Perhaps these differences in pA2 values could be interpreted as evidence in support of the concept of heterogeneity of opiate receptors in the peripheral system as suggested by Lord, Waterfield, Hughes & Kosterlitz, 1977.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The potency ratios for Straub tail in combi nation with 3 and 10 pg U-50,488H were 0.175 and 0.044, respectively. (27,28). It is essential to have highly selective opioid antagonists as pharmacological tools to investigate the pharmacological effects that are mediated by different types of opioid receptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%