1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf00422430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative subjective assessment of fatigue in static muscle effort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These research instruments are well-validated and standard. Therefore, the results obtained in our studies should be reliable, replicable, transparent, and transferable [45,46,49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These research instruments are well-validated and standard. Therefore, the results obtained in our studies should be reliable, replicable, transparent, and transferable [45,46,49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The second question (R.Q.2) was used to collect the ratings, reflecting the levels of necessity or importance of the prerequisites proposed by the responders. The responders followed the standard brainstorming procedures and a 5-point Likert-type rating scale [10,45]. Appendix A shows further details of the rating method and of the scale.…”
Section: Research Study 1 41 Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To do so, the responders were asked to follow a quantitative subjective assessment method [36] based on a five-point Likert scale, where 1 indicated the least necessary and 5 indicated the most necessary prerequisites.…”
Section: Research Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For research study 2, four field researchers (including two researchers) observed the implementation of various robotics-based math and science lessons taught by five teachers in the classrooms. The two researchers asked each teacher and two other field researchers to assess selected students following a quantitative subjective assessment method [36] based on a five-point Likert scale against each prerequisite, where 1 indicated the least qualified and 5 indicated the most qualified for a prerequisite. As a preliminary effort, the five teachers and four field researchers assessed 38 randomly selected students.…”
Section: Research Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%