Geo-Frontiers 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1061/41165(397)13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative Support for a Qualitative Foundation Reuse Assessment Tool

Abstract: This paper provides a quantification of the inputs for an existing qualitative foundation project planning model, namely

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The piles' lengths, L, are related by the scale factor N. The soil used in this study was Jumunjin sand. It is classified as SP in the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) with γ min = 1.351 g/cm 3 , γ max = 1.596 g/cm 3 , and C u = 1.402 [40]. Where γ min is the minimum unit weight, γ max is the maximum unit weight, and C u is the coefficient of uniformity.…”
Section: Test Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The piles' lengths, L, are related by the scale factor N. The soil used in this study was Jumunjin sand. It is classified as SP in the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) with γ min = 1.351 g/cm 3 , γ max = 1.596 g/cm 3 , and C u = 1.402 [40]. Where γ min is the minimum unit weight, γ max is the maximum unit weight, and C u is the coefficient of uniformity.…”
Section: Test Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…steel) CMP1 3 200 10,000 16.7 500 CMP2 4 8000 400 1 Waveform micropile (WMP) with length of 500 mm; 2 Waveform micropile (WMP) with length of 400 mm; 3 Conventional micropile (CMP) with length of 500 mm; 4 Conventional micropile (CMP) with length of 400 mm. The soil used in this study was Jumunjin sand.…”
Section: Pile (Up)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It produces colourcoded diagrams as outputs of the sustainability assessment based on a traffic-light scoring scale ( Figure 2). It has been applied to many different types of projects, including master planning (McGregor and Roberts, 2003), acoustics (Braithwaite and Cowell, 2007), company performance (Braithwaite, 2007), environmental geotechnics (Jefferson et al, 2007), foundation reuse (Laefer, 2011), and geotechnical engineering projects (Holt et al, 2010).…”
Section: Background: Sustainability Indicator Systems For Utility Infmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were subsequently used without 55 prejudice to test the proposed hybrid method. The initial five case studies were taken from the 'Reuse 56 of Foundations for Urban Sites' handbook and were considered using the following assessment meth-57 ods: the modified SPeAR method as proposed by Laefer (2011), as a modification of Sustainable Pro- Association document C653 ). The modified SPeAR method generates a visual 62 output ( Figure 1) based on quantitative inputs generated from both site and community related factors 63 (Table 1).…”
Section: Previous Assessments 50mentioning
confidence: 99%