Wine Tasting 2009
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-374181-3.00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative (Technical) Wine Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out with SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and comparison between samples was performed by using the least-squares differences (LSD) posthoc test. The level of significance of the sensory triangle tests was determined using Jackson’s method …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out with SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), and comparison between samples was performed by using the least-squares differences (LSD) posthoc test. The level of significance of the sensory triangle tests was determined using Jackson’s method …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each panellist was then asked to evaluate the sorrel wines for the quality attributes. Wines were rated on a modified version of the 20‐point rating system for wine quality based on appearance and colour (0–2 score), aroma and bouquet (0–5 score), taste and flavour (0–3 score), balance (0–2 score), development of duration (0–3 score), finish (0–2 score) and overall quality (0–3 score) as described by Jackson (2002). The wines were judged as superior 17–20, standard 13–16, below standard 9–12 and unacceptable 1–8 out of 20 point overall sensory quality score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%