2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-017-1387-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative trait loci for tuber blackspot bruise and enzymatic discoloration susceptibility in diploid potato

Abstract: Tuber tissue discolorations caused by impact (blackspot bruising) and enzymatic discoloration (ED) after tuber cutting are crucial quality traits of the cultivated potato. To understand the complex genetics of the traits, quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis using diploid mapping population and diversity array technology (DArT) markers was performed. The phenotypic assessment included the complex evaluation of blackspot bruising susceptibility through two methods: rotating drum (B RD) and falling bolt (B FB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SEN 12-01 genetic map is the first genetic map of the full potato genome constructed with DArTseq™ markers. Its length and density are comparable with earlier DArT maps for which the markers were generated by hybridization methods [18,19]. A main advantage of DArTseq™ markers was the possibility of comparison of the marker order on our genetic map to the physical map of the reference genome, by a BLAST search of the obtained sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SEN 12-01 genetic map is the first genetic map of the full potato genome constructed with DArTseq™ markers. Its length and density are comparable with earlier DArT maps for which the markers were generated by hybridization methods [18,19]. A main advantage of DArTseq™ markers was the possibility of comparison of the marker order on our genetic map to the physical map of the reference genome, by a BLAST search of the obtained sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…DNA isolation and DArTseq™ genotyping were performed as described by Plich et al [14]. Total genomic DNA was Table 1 Mean scores of three year evaluations for tuber greening and tuber greening depth (± SD) of the parents and standards and in the mapping population SEN 12-01 a Where 0-lack of greening and 5-very intensive greening (for tuber greening) or greening deeper that 10 mm (for tuber greening depth) b Values marked with the same letter within column do not differ significantly according to Duncan's test at p = 0.05 c Pearson's correlation coefficients between the results of assessment from particular years for the tested traits were all significant at p < 0.001 [18,19] using interval mapping with MapQTL®6 software [20]. QTLs were detected using an LOD threshold ≥ 3.0, estimated from cumulative distribution function of the maximum LOD on a chromosome for QTL analysis based on four QTL genotypes [21].…”
Section: Genetic Mapping and Qtl Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DArTseq markers mapped to chromosomes other than those in the reference potato genome (PGSC DM1‐3 v. 6.1) were removed manually from the maps. QTL analysis was performed as described previously (Hara‐Skrzypiec et al, 2018; Śliwka et al, 2016) using interval mapping with MapQTL 6 software (Van Ooijen, 2009). QTLs were detected using an LOD threshold ≥3.0 estimated from the cumulative distribution function of the maximum LOD on a chromosome for QTL analysis based on four QTL genotypes (Van Ooijen, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DArTseq™ markers mapped to chromosomes other than those in the reference potato genome (PGSC DM1 −3 v 6.1) were removed manually from the maps. QTL analysis was performed as described previously (Śliwka et al 2016, Hara-Skrzypiec et al 2018) using interval mapping with MapQTL®6 software (Van Ooijen 2009). QTLs were detected using an LOD threshold ≥ 3.0 estimated from the cumulative distribution function of the maximum LOD on a chromosome for QTL analysis based on four QTL genotypes (van Ooijen 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%