2012
DOI: 10.1071/an12100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative trait loci underlying hatching weight and growth traits in an F2 intercross between two strains of Japanese quail

Abstract: A three-generation resource population was developed using two distinct Japanese quail strains, wild and white, to map quantitative trait loci underlying hatching weight and growth traits. Eight pairs of white and wild birds were crossed reciprocally and 34 F1 birds were produced. The F1 birds were intercrossed to generate 422 F2 offspring. All of the animals from three generations (472 birds) were genotyped for eight microsatellite markers on chromosome 1. Liveweight data from hatch to 5 weeks of age were col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The present findings are partially consistent with Deeb and Lamont (2002), who found a high level of heterosis only for the abdominal fat percentage in the F 2 chicken population. As suggested by Sohrabi et al (2012), a possible explanation for the higher level of heterosis in the F 2 generation might be related to the genetic structure of the F 2 birds as regards the sex chromosomes.…”
Section: Performance and Carcass Traitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present findings are partially consistent with Deeb and Lamont (2002), who found a high level of heterosis only for the abdominal fat percentage in the F 2 chicken population. As suggested by Sohrabi et al (2012), a possible explanation for the higher level of heterosis in the F 2 generation might be related to the genetic structure of the F 2 birds as regards the sex chromosomes.…”
Section: Performance and Carcass Traitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the available literature on Japanese quail, only few publications can be found reporting QTL responsible for laying traits, the quality of the egg and the shell (Minvielle et al, 2005), daily weight gains in certain weeks of life Sohrabi et al, 2012), the shape of the laying curve , or behavioral traits associated with fearfulness (tonic immobility; Beaumont et al, 2005). There is no information on the loci linked with carcass and meat quality traits in quails such as IMC properties.…”
Section: Growth Performance Meat Quality Traits and Genetic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Using current data it might be only speculate that these results could be related to the genetic structure of the birds as regards mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the sex chromosomes. In fact, as suggested by Sohrabi et al (2012), if the same effect is estimated in both males and females, it is likely to imply a maternal effect or genetic differences in mtDNA; while, an effect only observed in females is likely to reflect differences in the sex chromosome. Hybrid combinations increased the total PUFA amount in F 2 compared to F 1 quails (P<0.01 and P<0.05 for females and males, respectively), with intermediate value for F 0 ones, due to the significant contribution of linoleic and α-linolenic acids (data not shown).…”
Section: Total Lipid Cholesterol Contents and Fatty Acid Compositionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…QTL significant for growth traits were found also on chromosome 1 in this population (Sohrabi et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…At each position, mapping QTL using desirable model determines whether a significant amount of the variance in a quantitative trait can be associated with a QTL at that position. QTL variance determined as the reduction of the residual variance acquired by fitting a QTL at the corresponding location was relatively small for the detected loci (Sohrabi et al 2012). The proportion of the F 2 phenotypic variation explained by the significant additive and dominance QTL effects ranged from 1.06 to 3.33% and 0.71 to 4.36%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%