2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2018.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative ultrasonometry for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in human skeletal remains: New methods and standards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…QUS is not used to obtain images, but to measure and assess tissue properties (60). This modality may be used to evaluate osteoporosis (61,62) and fracture healing (63)(64)(65). QUS is a low-cost technique that has been applied at different anatomical sites, but according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) official guideline (66) the only validated skeletal site is the calcaneus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QUS is not used to obtain images, but to measure and assess tissue properties (60). This modality may be used to evaluate osteoporosis (61,62) and fracture healing (63)(64)(65). QUS is a low-cost technique that has been applied at different anatomical sites, but according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) official guideline (66) the only validated skeletal site is the calcaneus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the BIF, more than any single biomarker, offers a comprehensive view of the frailty of each individual and can be used as a proxy for his or her pre-existing health status and, thus, for the risk of death. Stature was estimated from long bone measurements (Gualdi-Russo et al 2018;Pearson 1899;Trotter and Gleser 1958), whereas osteoporosis was evaluated through quantitative ultrasonometry (Rinaldo et al 2018). Each biomarker was considered as a categorical variable, assigning a score of 1 if present and 0 if absent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter include methodological studies focused on estimation of age-at-death and attribution of sex [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61], the study of entheseal changes in modern humans [62][63][64][65][66][67], and the discussion of their variability among extinct taxa [1][2][3][4]. Additional topics of investigation have been the various expression and demographic distribution of skeletal morphological variants and pathological changes [68][69][70][71], as well as dental and palate traits [72][73][74][75][76]. These collections have also offered excellent biological, demographic, and biocultural background in the analysis and discussion of case studies [77][78][79].…”
Section: Scientific Osteological Collections and Their Utilitymentioning
confidence: 99%