2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02239.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantity of the Tetracycline Resistance Gene tet(M) Differs Substantially between Meat at Slaughterhouses and at Retail

Abstract: We successfully applied the direct quantitative monitoring of resistance genes in meat, which generally might aid as a useful and rapid additional tool for risk assessment. We know that bacteria provide a large pool of resistance genes, which are widely shared between each other-the larger the pool is, the more genes might be exchanged. Thus, in terms of resistance gene monitoring, we should sometimes overcome the restricted view on single bacteria and look at the gene pool, instead.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important matter considering the high prevalence of these genes in gram‐negative bacteria and their abilities to be transferred to human bacteria (Aarestrup 2005). This idea of monitoring a gene pool instead of single bacteria was already highlighted by Hölzel and others (2011); however, they focused their research on the quantification of the tetM gene, which is more frequent in gram‐positive bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important matter considering the high prevalence of these genes in gram‐negative bacteria and their abilities to be transferred to human bacteria (Aarestrup 2005). This idea of monitoring a gene pool instead of single bacteria was already highlighted by Hölzel and others (2011); however, they focused their research on the quantification of the tetM gene, which is more frequent in gram‐positive bacteria.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tn916-Tn1545 family) and can therefore easily be transferred from one bacterial species to another (Doherty et al, 2000). Accordingly, tet(M) has been detected in numerous food matrices, including dairy (Flórez et al, 2014) and meat products (Hölzel et al, 2011). Interestingly, in the present study, two samples (MW 1.1 and MW 1.2) did not carry any other AR gene than tet(M).…”
Section: Quantitative Detection Of Antibiotic Resistance Genes In Insect Samplesmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Compared to other food matrices, the resistance gene quantity carried by edible insects varies within the same range. For example, the tet(M) gene was reported to be present almost up to 7 and 8 log copies/cm 2 chicken and pork meat, respectively (Hölzel et al, 2011). Likewise, for cheeses, the tet(S) gene was observed ranging from 4.5 up to 8 log copies/g (Manuzon et al, 2007).…”
Section: Quantitative Detection Of Antibiotic Resistance Genes In Insect Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%