2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 2006
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2006.261862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantized Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
270
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
270
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From Lemma 1, one has as t → ∞. Hence, the leader-following practical consensus is achieved under the consensus protocol (14). The proof of the second part is similar to Theorem 2, and is therefore omitted here.…”
Section: B Distributed Event-triggered Control With Uniform Quantizamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From Lemma 1, one has as t → ∞. Hence, the leader-following practical consensus is achieved under the consensus protocol (14). The proof of the second part is similar to Theorem 2, and is therefore omitted here.…”
Section: B Distributed Event-triggered Control With Uniform Quantizamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hence, we assume that the followers get access to the information of the leader and sample the information of the leader based on their triggering sequences. Based on the observations, we consider the protocol as (14).…”
Section: B Distributed Event-triggered Control With Uniform Quantizamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9] Consider a distributed algorithm in which, for any graph G with k nodes, in addition to the constraint that the value x i , i = 1, · · · , k at each node isalways an integer and the sum of the k values in the network does not change with time. The following conditions are met: (C1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 4.2:[9] When quantized consensus, at any time t, two nodes are selected and the value difference of the two nodes are decreased when bigger than 1, or do swap when the difference equals to 1, or else do nothing. Let N max (t) = |i|x i (t) = M (t)| be the number of nodes with the maximum value in the network at time t. Then, for any time t such that D(t) ≥ 2,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%