1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.32.8126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum and classical mobility determination of the dominant scattering mechanism in the two-dimensional electron gas of an AlGaAs/GaAs heterojunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
106
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
106
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in silicon MOSFETs), but for long range Coulomb interactions (e.g. from modulation doping) τ t and τ q are quite different [16,17,18]. The difference lies in the fact that τ q counts all scattering events, while τ t is weighted towards large-angle scattering events that cause a significant change in the momentum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in silicon MOSFETs), but for long range Coulomb interactions (e.g. from modulation doping) τ t and τ q are quite different [16,17,18]. The difference lies in the fact that τ q counts all scattering events, while τ t is weighted towards large-angle scattering events that cause a significant change in the momentum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely assumed that the ratio of the transport to the single particle lifetime τ t /τ q can be taken as an indication of the dominant scattering mechanism [16,17,18,19]. The conventional wisdom is that τ t /τ q should be close to 1 for background impurity scattering and much larger than 1 for remote ionised impurity scattering.…”
Section: B Comparison Of τT/τqr and τT/τqmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lifetime damping rate is the measure of the rate at which particles scatters out of an eigenstate, whereas the transport scattering rate is a measure of the rate of current decay due to scattering out of an eigenstate. In normal 2DEGs, the transport scattering time can be much larger than the impurity induced lifetime /2γ, particularly in high mobility modulation doped 2D systems where the charged impurities are placed very far from the 2DEG 8,9 . Recently, the issue of transport scattering time versus impurity scattering lifetime in graphene has been discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of scattering from an impurity potential that is not diagonal in the these eigenstates, the lifetime scattering rate of the eigenstate, γ, is non-zero and can be measured experimentally by fitting the line-shape of the low-field Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) oscillations. 7,8 The effect of disorder scattering on the SdH line shape is equivalent to increasing the sample temperature and one can therefore measure this Dingle temperature (T D ) and relate it to the single-particle lifetime through γ = 2πk B T D . To avoid potential confusion, we mention that the lifetime damping rate γ discussed in this paper is not equal to the transport scattering rate which governs the electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%