2013
DOI: 10.1126/science.1226897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Back-Action of an Individual Variable-Strength Measurement

Abstract: Measuring a quantum system can randomly perturb its state. The strength and nature of this back-action depend on the quantity that is measured. In a partial measurement performed by an ideal apparatus, quantum physics predicts that the system remains in a pure state whose evolution can be tracked perfectly from the measurement record. We demonstrated this property using a superconducting qubit dispersively coupled to a cavity traversed by a microwave signal. The back-action on the qubit state of a single measu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
330
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(335 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
330
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in a qubit-state dependent shift of the cavity mode frequency. By applying a microwave tone to a single cavity mode, one can infer the qubit state from the phase of the reflected signal 16 ; this readout scheme has been used extensively with superconducting qubits for quantum information processing, and also to perform weak measurements 17 and track quantum trajectories of a single qubit 18 . In our configuration, each cavity mode constitutes a measurement channel which extracts the projection of the qubit spin along the σ z axis of the Bloch sphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in a qubit-state dependent shift of the cavity mode frequency. By applying a microwave tone to a single cavity mode, one can infer the qubit state from the phase of the reflected signal 16 ; this readout scheme has been used extensively with superconducting qubits for quantum information processing, and also to perform weak measurements 17 and track quantum trajectories of a single qubit 18 . In our configuration, each cavity mode constitutes a measurement channel which extracts the projection of the qubit spin along the σ z axis of the Bloch sphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The joint-readout of the qubits used for tomography, was implemented with high-fidelity singleshot measurements 35 , by pulsing the cavity input for 500 ns using the source f GG c (msmt) (Agilent N5183) set at ω gg c (see Fig. ED1).…”
Section: Joint-readout Implementation With Jpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting case of n m → 0 is approached when the measurement record is dominated by back-actioninduced fluctuations. This occurs when the measurement nears unit efficiency [265], i.e., when the measurement rate, Γ meas = 1/16n imp , approaches the effective thermal decoherence rate, Γ tot = (n m,th + n m,BA )Γ m ≥ Γ meas . To meet this condition for a typical mechanical oscillator a linear position sensor must achieve an imprecision far (∼ n m,th times) below the natural scale set by the standard quantum limit (SQL, see section 2.3) (n imp = n m,BA = 1/4), while maintaining back-action near the uncertainty limit: 4 √ n m,BA n imp ≥ 1.…”
Section: Heisenberg-uncertainty-limited Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This penalty would appear to prohibit ground-state cooling, as it entails substantially heating the oscillator to achieve the necessary imprecision. Remarkably, however, feedback counteracts back-action [265,293], so that a phonon occupancy of n m ≈ 2 n imp (n m,BA + n m,th ) − 1/2 < 1 (eq. (3.1.11)) can still be achieved.…”
Section: Heisenberg-uncertainty-limited Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation