1992
DOI: 10.1080/10426509208055326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Chemical Calculations of P-N and P-P Coupling Constants of Cyclotriphosphazenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If 1 J P,N increases with the electronegativity of R, it had to be positive when R D F. In another study on quantum chemical calculations of P,N and P,P coupling constants of cyclotriphosphazenes, the same group found that the former signs should be reversed. 20 It can be seen in Table 3 that our calculations are in agreement with their last assumption.…”
Section: -11supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If 1 J P,N increases with the electronegativity of R, it had to be positive when R D F. In another study on quantum chemical calculations of P,N and P,P coupling constants of cyclotriphosphazenes, the same group found that the former signs should be reversed. 20 It can be seen in Table 3 that our calculations are in agreement with their last assumption.…”
Section: -11supporting
confidence: 90%
“…We have assumed, following Keat et al, 6 that all the experimental values of 2 J P,P are positive although Thomas and co-workers 15,20 discussed the possibility of some 2 J P,P being negative. Since the total J is the sum of four terms, we looked at them and it appears that the Fermi contact term is the very dominant term (about 97%), as usually happens when fluorine atoms are not involved.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the 2 J(P,P) value is purely given by the FC term. This is in accordance with conclusions of Thomas et al 49 Although the SD term is usually considered to be smaller than the error in the DFT calculation of the FC term, the theoretical couplings could be improved by including it in the calculation. Unfortunately, the program used did not allow us to do so.…”
Section: Dft Calculationsupporting
confidence: 84%