1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4018(99)00157-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum correlations in second harmonic generation with a detuned cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle requiring that V (X i )V (Ŷ i ) ≥ 1. We note here that any cavity detuning or Kerr interaction can change the quadrature angle at which the best quantum correlations are found [31,32], but this is not generally the case for a resonant cavity with χ (2) interactions.…”
Section: Detection Of Tripartite Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle requiring that V (X i )V (Ŷ i ) ≥ 1. We note here that any cavity detuning or Kerr interaction can change the quadrature angle at which the best quantum correlations are found [31,32], but this is not generally the case for a resonant cavity with χ (2) interactions.…”
Section: Detection Of Tripartite Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…When θ = 0, this is usually known as the X, or amplitude, quadrature, and when θ = π/2, it is usually known as the Y , or phase, quadrature. In this work, all the correlations we present involve the X and Y quadratures, which would not be the case if our cavities were not resonant at all relevant frequencies [40].…”
Section: Quantum Correlations In the Traveling-wave Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is different from the cases with coupled χ (2) interactions, where setting the detunings equal in strength to the evanescent couplings meant that the optimal correlations were found for zero quadrature angle [8,9]. It happens because the χ (3) interaction itself also changes the quadrature angles at which the optimal correlations may be measured [26], acting in some sense as an intensity dependent detuning [27]. In principle it may be possible to dynamically control the detuning, coupling and intensities so that the largest violations of the inequalities were found for θ = 0, although we will not investigate this further because it is relatively simple to control the phase of local oscillators to choose the appropriate angles.…”
Section: Entanglement Criteriamentioning
confidence: 97%