2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum dot transport in soil, plants, and insects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using confocal microscopy have shown that polymeric NPs can penetrate lung cells [36] and CeO 2 NPs can penetrate human bronchial cells [24]; however, these types of cells do not have cell walls. Al-Salim et al [37] used fluorescence to study the uptake of quantum dots (QD) by walled cell in plants. They observed the fluorescence emission of QD in the vasculature of cut stems of Allium cepa , Chrysanthemum sp., and Lolium perenne , but not in the rooted plants [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies using confocal microscopy have shown that polymeric NPs can penetrate lung cells [36] and CeO 2 NPs can penetrate human bronchial cells [24]; however, these types of cells do not have cell walls. Al-Salim et al [37] used fluorescence to study the uptake of quantum dots (QD) by walled cell in plants. They observed the fluorescence emission of QD in the vasculature of cut stems of Allium cepa , Chrysanthemum sp., and Lolium perenne , but not in the rooted plants [37].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al-Salim et al [37] used fluorescence to study the uptake of quantum dots (QD) by walled cell in plants. They observed the fluorescence emission of QD in the vasculature of cut stems of Allium cepa , Chrysanthemum sp., and Lolium perenne , but not in the rooted plants [37]. In the present study, FITC-stained CeO 2 NP aggregates were effectively seen within corn plants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As no NPs were detected in the cell wall, intercellular spaces or in plasmodesmata, and what is most important, in the neighbouring cells, we postulate that nanoparticles do not move apoplastically or symplasmically in barley cultivar that was studied, at least in the culture conditions that were used here. Researches on the penetration of nanoparticles into wounded plants have shown that they can accumulate most NPs or QDs only in the first few centimetres from the injured stems 39, 40 which indicates that the translocation of NPs is limited, at least in some plants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in pH, ionic strength (IS), dissolved ions, and natural organic matter (NOM) continuously change the form of occurrence of nanoparticles and their coagulation rate and thus possibly also their bioavailability and toxicity (Chenget al" 2011;Klaine et al, 2008;Navarro et al, 2008;Van Hoecke etal,, 2011), Soils may be exposed to ENM following the application of wastewatet treatment biosolid material, but exposure may also occur through leakage from landfills, or from spillage/fugitive emissions to waters and land from manufacturing facilities (Gottschalk et al,, 2009) or ENM may even be added deliberately as pesticides (Batuah and Dutta, 2009). Engineered nanomaterials added to soil can be taken up by plants or invertebrates leading to toxicity (Al-Salim et al, 2011;Shoults-Wilson et al, 2011), but how the bioavailability and toxicity of ENM is affected by differences in soil physical and chemical properties has not yet been investigated systematically. Initial investigations suggest differences in soil properties can have a large effect on bioavailability of ENM (Shoults-Wilson et al,, 2011;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%