2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum interference effects in titanium nitride films at low temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent to the fact that all the samples typically exhibit the same thickness (90 -100 nm) and have been deposited at same temperature (300 K), such a variation can be attributed to the suppression of the defects across the film surface and the grain boundary sites due to significant reduction in <E sp > and addition of Ti interface, which in-turn leads to larger grain growth and considerable reduction in porosity of the films. It yields lowering in scattering of the conduction electrons with the defects, which plays a dominant role at ambient temperature [59,60]. The result is in accordance with the XRD data as well, where an inverse proportionality between the crystallite size and the resistivity of the samples can be observed (see SM) [36].…”
Section: Room-temperature Resistivitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Subsequent to the fact that all the samples typically exhibit the same thickness (90 -100 nm) and have been deposited at same temperature (300 K), such a variation can be attributed to the suppression of the defects across the film surface and the grain boundary sites due to significant reduction in <E sp > and addition of Ti interface, which in-turn leads to larger grain growth and considerable reduction in porosity of the films. It yields lowering in scattering of the conduction electrons with the defects, which plays a dominant role at ambient temperature [59,60]. The result is in accordance with the XRD data as well, where an inverse proportionality between the crystallite size and the resistivity of the samples can be observed (see SM) [36].…”
Section: Room-temperature Resistivitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Indeed, the resistivity variation of Cu-doped TiN x O y was less than 5% compared to almost 90% for monocrystalline TiN. , At the same time, the effective resistivity of Cu-doped TiN x O y is higher than in pure TiN. Our R ( T ) data for the G2 sample show a resistivity minimum at 50 K, and the curve shape is quite similar to the pulsed laser-deposited (PLD) single-crystalline TiN by Roy et al, but the absolute values are 30% smaller . The low-temperature negative TCR may originate from the electron–electron interaction, hopping conduction, or 2D weak localization phenomena .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Such behavior is a signature of the electron−electron (e−e) interaction or weak scattering on disordered fixed defects that follow a similar law R(T) ≈ aT 0.5 , and coefficient a is known to change sign as a function of disorder. 62,63 It is quite different from both moderately doped semiconductors where scattering is dominated by ionized impurities R(T) ≈ T −1.5 and heavily doped semiconductors, which have positive TCR at low temperatures. 66,67 Figure 8c summarizes the data for resistivity dependence on the oxygen y-content in TiN x O y films grown by different researchers.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the military aircraft can contain up to 50% of its fuselage made of titanium alloys. Particularly, TiN films exhibit excellent mechanical properties such as high hardness, wear resistance, high thermal stability, and high chemical stability [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Additionally, TiN thin films are used in many industrial sectors due to its high abrasion resistance, low friction coefficient [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%