2011
DOI: 10.4171/101-1/4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum loop algebras, quiver varieties, and cluster algebras

Abstract: These notes reflect the contents of three lectures given at the workshop of the 14th International Conference on Representations of Algebras (ICRA XIV), held in August 2010 in Tokyo. We first provide an introduction to quantum loop algebras and their finite-dimensional representations. We explain in particular Nakajima's geometric description of the irreducible q-characters in terms of graded quiver varieties. We then present a recent attempt to understand the tensor structure of the category of finitedimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with the structure of a standard U q ( g)-module, with highest weight encoded by W. It was proved by Lusztig (in the ungraded case), and by Savage and Tingley (in the graded case), that L • (V, W) is homeomorphic to a Grassmannian of submodules of an injective module over the graded preprojective algebra (see [Le2,§2.8]). Therefore, using the description of K (i) 1,r given in Example 4.7, we see that the varieties involved in our geometric q-character formula for standard modules in the simply laced case are homeomorphic to certain Nakajima varieties L • (V, W).…”
Section: A Geometric Character Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the structure of a standard U q ( g)-module, with highest weight encoded by W. It was proved by Lusztig (in the ungraded case), and by Savage and Tingley (in the graded case), that L • (V, W) is homeomorphic to a Grassmannian of submodules of an injective module over the graded preprojective algebra (see [Le2,§2.8]). Therefore, using the description of K (i) 1,r given in Example 4.7, we see that the varieties involved in our geometric q-character formula for standard modules in the simply laced case are homeomorphic to certain Nakajima varieties L • (V, W).…”
Section: A Geometric Character Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the intense works on affine quantum groups (see the reviews [13,40]), the representation theory of U q ( g) is still less understood as the super case poses one essential difficulty, the smallness of Weyl group symmetry.…”
Section: Baxter Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M q be the set of Laurent monomials in the Y i,a , and let M + q be the subset of dominant monomials in M q . If S is a simple object of C q such that the highest monomial of χ q (S) is m ∈ M + q , then S will be denoted by L(m) [16]. For i ∈ I and a ∈ C(q), the simple modules L(Y i,a ) are called fundamental modules.…”
Section: Representations Of U Q (Lg)mentioning
confidence: 99%