2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum Markov chains: Description of hybrid systems, decidability of equivalence, and model checking linear-time properties

Abstract: In this paper, we study a model of quantum Markov chains that is a quantum analogue of Markov chains and is obtained by replacing probabilities in transition matrices with quantum operations. We show that this model is very suited to describe hybrid systems that consist of a quantum component and a classical one, although it has the same expressive power as another quantum Markov model proposed in the literature. Indeed, hybrid systems are often encountered in quantum information processing; for example, both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference between classical Markov chains and quantum Markov chains is the use of super-operators instead of probability values to decorate the transitions; this difference, however, has a considerable effect on the model checking algorithm, as pointed out in, e.g., [49,72]. Consider the two Markov chains, enriched with a parity acceptance condition, shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: The Standard Automata-based Approach Does Not Work Directly ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only difference between classical Markov chains and quantum Markov chains is the use of super-operators instead of probability values to decorate the transitions; this difference, however, has a considerable effect on the model checking algorithm, as pointed out in, e.g., [49,72]. Consider the two Markov chains, enriched with a parity acceptance condition, shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: The Standard Automata-based Approach Does Not Work Directly ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M = (S, Q, pri) be a PQMC on H; for each s, t ∈ S, let E s,t = { E s,t j | j ∈ J s,t } be the set of Kraus operators with J s,t as set of indexes for the super-operator E s,t = Q(s, t). Following [72], let E M = { |t s| ⊗ E s,t j | s, t ∈ S, j ∈ J s,t } be the super-operator acting on the extended Hilbert space H c ⊗ H, where H c is the |S|-dimensional Hilbert space with orthonormal basis { |s | s ∈ S }.…”
Section: Computing Pqmc Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(20) Thus, our model can be expressed in the language proposed by Monras et al However, formalism proposed in this paper has three notable advantages. First, it presents a hybrid quantum-classical model similar to the one presented in [14] therefore has similar field of applications. Our model intuitively generalizes both classical and quantum models.…”
Section: Of Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Checking on quantum DTMC. A quantum discrete-time Markov chain (quantum DTMC) is a composite model on classical state space (a finite set) and quantum state space (a continuum), on which the evolution is discrete-time given by quantum operations [LF15]. Gay et al [GNP08] restricted the quantum operations to Clifford group gates (i.e., Hadamard, CNOT and the phase gates) and the whole state space as a finite set of describable states, named stabilizer states, that are closed under those Clifford group gates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%