1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.70.3239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum noise reduction in optical amplification

Abstract: Quantum fluctuations in optical amplification are investigated with a nondegenerate optical parametric amplifier whose internal idler mode is coupled to a squeezed vacuum. Reductions of the inherent quantum noise of the amplifier are observed with a minimum noise level 0.7 dB below the usual noise level of the amplifier with its internal idler mode in a vacuum state. With a small coherent field as the signal input, the amplified output exhibits an improvement in signal-to-noise ratio of 0.5 dB for the case of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other advantages are the potential for optical phase and amplitude regeneration [4,5], dispersion compensation [6], and the suppression of modulational instability [7]. Various schemes to achieve PSA have been reported previously, including degenerate parametric amplification (PA) (or squeezed-state generation) in a χ (2) medium [8][9][10][11] and degenerate four-wave mixing (FWM) in a χ (3) medium [12][13][14]. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other advantages are the potential for optical phase and amplitude regeneration [4,5], dispersion compensation [6], and the suppression of modulational instability [7]. Various schemes to achieve PSA have been reported previously, including degenerate parametric amplification (PA) (or squeezed-state generation) in a χ (2) medium [8][9][10][11] and degenerate four-wave mixing (FWM) in a χ (3) medium [12][13][14]. In Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These amplifiers are examples of phase-insensitive amplifiers (PIAs), since their gain does not depend on the optical phase of the input signals [1]. In theory one could also use phase-sensitive amplifiers (PSAs), which are capable of amplifying or deamplifying input signals according to the phase of the optical signal [2,3]. One of the most intriguing advantages of PSAs is that the noise figure can potentially be reduced below the 3dB quantum limit of PIAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date phase-insensitive amplification at the quantum limit has been only partially demonstrated [8,9]: a number of difficulties are indeed involved in practice, especially for low gain applications. These difficulties mainly lie in the fact that the amplified field has to be efficiently coupled, mediated by a non linearity, to a pump field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, provided that the spurious technical noise N cl is constant or has only a weak dependence on G, the noise figure still approaches the quantum limit of 3dB in the high gain regime. The situation is different at low gains, as technical noise or internal losses become devastating for quantum noise limited performance [8,9]. To date, these effects have hitherto prevented the full demonstration of quantum noise limited phase-insensitive amplification in the low gain regime [11], which is the domain of interest in the context of quantum information science.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light characterization by measurement and reconstruction of the Wigner function shares some similarities with the NG criterion. In particular: it is sensitive to the losses and is able to distinguish Gaussian from non-Gaussian states [13][14][15]. Additionally, this criterion [12] is still applicable in the case of low emission and detection efficiency in contrast to the direct measurement of the negativity of the Wigner function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%