2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-019-0426-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantum non-demolition measurement of an electron spin qubit

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is limited by a relatively short electron spin lifetime, compared with single nuclear spins in silicon where 99.8% readout fidelity is achieved as a result of >99.98% non-demolition fidelity 19,20 . We note that, while both F M and F P are successfully improved by the cumulative QND readout, the observed F QND falls short of our earlier expectations 18 and the overall QND performance is impacted by this. The ratio T # 1 =T " 1 ¼ 31 is deviated from the ideal thermal population ratio (=16) between the Zeeman sublevels at the electron temperature (~50 mK), and the measured T "…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is limited by a relatively short electron spin lifetime, compared with single nuclear spins in silicon where 99.8% readout fidelity is achieved as a result of >99.98% non-demolition fidelity 19,20 . We note that, while both F M and F P are successfully improved by the cumulative QND readout, the observed F QND falls short of our earlier expectations 18 and the overall QND performance is impacted by this. The ratio T # 1 =T " 1 ¼ 31 is deviated from the ideal thermal population ratio (=16) between the Zeeman sublevels at the electron temperature (~50 mK), and the measured T "…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…We separate the error in the prepared qubit spin state (during the process of initialization, rotation, and preceding ancilla measurements) from the measurement infidelity 18 by expressing the joint probability P(m i m 30 ) as Supplementary Fig. 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Naively, one expects that continuous, perfect monitoring will rapidly purify the system; however, it is known from the study of quantum-error-correcting codes that quantum states can be protected from extensive numbers of local measurements [12][13][14]. Recently, there has been significant experimental progress towards realizing the requisite ingredients for such measurement-driven purification of manybody states in quantum computing platforms [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by a theoretical analysis of two-qubit gate implementation employing state-dependent potentials in cold atom systems in optical fiber array [27][28][29], we recently proposed a spin-selective electron transfer method described in [12], which realizes non-local qubit operations in a quantum dot array. This proposal also offers quantum non-demolition measurement of electron spin [30][31][32] provided that the electron position is measured without introducing the dissipation to the electron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%