Two examples are presented where the photon emission on spontaneous parametric down-conversion is prevented when attempts are made to infer the moment of emission. This inhibition is analyzed in terms of the disturbance caused on the system by the modifications that must be introduced in order to make possible such inference. [S0031-9007(96) PACS numbers: 42.50.Dv, 03.65.Bz The Zeno effect refers to the inhibition of the isolated temporal evolution of a dynamical system when the observation of such evolution is attempted [1]. This observation is usually described by frequent measurements on the system performed in order to discover whether the initial state has changed or not. In the limit of very frequent measurements, continuous observation, or arbitrary high resolution, it may happen that the system is locked on its initial state and the evolution, which was the aim of the observation, is in fact inhibited and does not occur. It has been studied in atomic transitions [2], double-well potentials [3], and neutron spin dynamics [4], for example. Parallels can also be drawn with the interaction-free measurements [5].In the first derivation the state reduction postulate of quantum mechanics was used [1]. According to this axiom, any measurement will abruptly change the state of the system under consideration so that it will be left in an eigenstate of the measured observable. This would link the Zeno effect directly with the quantum measurement theory. Since then, other approaches have been presented by means of purely dynamical terms without having to appeal to the reduction postulate [3,4,6].In most cases, in order to observe the intermediate stages of the evolution, it is necessary to modify the observed system in some way. The effect of these changes can be determined and understood only by a full quantum mechanical treatment of the whole process, which shows that even the most careful of all these observations inevitably leaves a trace on the observed system. In other words, the appearance of this effect can be attributed to this modification, or disturbance, which makes the observation possible, irrespective of whether the planned measurement is actually carried out or not.Here we present two examples of Zeno effect that suit this framework. In both examples the process under observation is the simultaneous emission of a pair of photons by spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a nonlinear crystal. The entangled nature of this photon pair has been utilized hitherto in a number of fundamental experiments in quantum optics [7]. In our context, one of the emitted photons is evidence of the emission of the other. We will consider two different schemes using this fact in order to infer when the emission of the other photon takes place. In both cases these attempts lead to the inhibition of the emission.Firstly, we briefly recall the isolated (or unobserved) dynamics of the system. A nonlinear crystal of length L in Fig. 1(a) is pumped by a strong, classical, and coherent field (not shown in the figure) to ...