2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06333.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasars, their host galaxies and their central black holes

Abstract: We present the final results from our deep Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging study of the host galaxies of radio‐quiet quasars (RQQs), radio‐loud quasars (RLQs) and radio galaxies (RGs). We describe and analyse new Wide Field & Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) R‐band observations for 14 objects, which when combined with the first tranche of HST imaging reported in McLure et al., provide a complete and consistent set of deep, red, line‐free images for statistically matched samples of 13 RQQs, 10 RLQs and 10 RGs in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

115
763
15
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 506 publications
(894 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(227 reference statements)
115
763
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…latter sample from low-level AGN activity will likely only serve to decrease the observed differences between the two samples. As a result of the previous arguments regarding the purity of the radio AGN host sample, despite the large redshift baseline of this sample (0 < z < 4), the redshift evolution of the radio power density (e.g., Condon 1989Condon , 2002Dunlop et al 2003;Smolčić et al 2009) has little effect on our results. Or, rather, this evolution will simply result in more radio AGN being selected at high redshifts as the redshift distribution of the ∼10% of the radio AGN selected hosts whose L TIR subtracted P ν,1.4 GHz is less than log(P ν,1.4 GHz ) = 23 (see above) is indistinguishable from that of the remaining 90% of the sample.…”
Section: Active Galactic Nuclei Selection and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…latter sample from low-level AGN activity will likely only serve to decrease the observed differences between the two samples. As a result of the previous arguments regarding the purity of the radio AGN host sample, despite the large redshift baseline of this sample (0 < z < 4), the redshift evolution of the radio power density (e.g., Condon 1989Condon , 2002Dunlop et al 2003;Smolčić et al 2009) has little effect on our results. Or, rather, this evolution will simply result in more radio AGN being selected at high redshifts as the redshift distribution of the ∼10% of the radio AGN selected hosts whose L TIR subtracted P ν,1.4 GHz is less than log(P ν,1.4 GHz ) = 23 (see above) is indistinguishable from that of the remaining 90% of the sample.…”
Section: Active Galactic Nuclei Selection and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…7 We therefore compare the predicted "stochastically fueled" fraction of AGN with the fraction of disk-dominated AGN hosts, as a function of luminosity and redshift. At low redshifts, we compare with the PG quasar sample of Dunlop et al (2003); Floyd et al (2004) (we plot the fraction with best-fit bulge-to-total mass ratio B/T < 0.5 in bins of Lbol, estimated from the observed nuclear Vband luminosities, with Poisson errors). At z ∼ 0.5 − 1, we compare the low-luminosity sample from COSMOS studied in Gabor et al (2009) and Cisternas et al (2011); we plot the "final" quoted fraction of disk-dominated galaxies in the sample (with the approximate ∼ 10% systematic difference between classifiers quoted therein) and 90% range of Lbol estimated from the hard X-ray luminosities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the duty cycle of "stochastically" fueled systems is dominated by gas-rich disks, and most major merger-triggered systems that induce strong bulge and BH growth will appear as spheroids, we compare the observed fraction of disk-dominated AGN host galaxies in different luminosity/redshift intervals. At low redshift, measured from the PG quasar sample of Dunlop et al (2003); Floyd et al (2004, circles). At intermediate redshift, measured in low-luminosity AGN in COSMOS in Gabor et al (2009);Cisternas et al (2011, triangle), and in true (Type 2) quasars in Zakamska et al (2006Zakamska et al ( , 2008; Liu et al (2009, inverted triangle).…”
Section: Stochastic Fuelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dunlop et al 2003;Floyd et al 2004), while for red quasars the merger fraction increases to ∼ 85 per cent. Assuming that the merger fraction might rises with bolometric luminosity (e.g.…”
Section: The Star Formation Dependence On Agn Activitymentioning
confidence: 97%