2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasi-static and dynamic deformation mechanisms interpreted by microstructural evolution in TWinning Induced Plasticity (TWIP) steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 4 – 6 shows FCC and BCC inverse pole figure (IPF) maps of the quasi-statically or dynamically tensioned A850, A900, and A950 specimens, respectively, at different true strains. Since the dynamically tensioned specimen is rapidly fractured, the interrupted dynamic tensile test was performed after a newly designed dynamic tensile specimen was placed in an external interruption device 26 . In this interrupted test, basic assumptions of the split Hopkinson tensile bar test, i.e ., uniform strain in the specimen and one-dimensional wave, have been violated 27 , and dynamic stress-strain curves could be problematic because this problem might be unsolvable owing to the nature of dynamic tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figures 4 – 6 shows FCC and BCC inverse pole figure (IPF) maps of the quasi-statically or dynamically tensioned A850, A900, and A950 specimens, respectively, at different true strains. Since the dynamically tensioned specimen is rapidly fractured, the interrupted dynamic tensile test was performed after a newly designed dynamic tensile specimen was placed in an external interruption device 26 . In this interrupted test, basic assumptions of the split Hopkinson tensile bar test, i.e ., uniform strain in the specimen and one-dimensional wave, have been violated 27 , and dynamic stress-strain curves could be problematic because this problem might be unsolvable owing to the nature of dynamic tests.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plate-shaped tensile specimens (gage length; 30 mm, width; 5 mm, thickness; 1 mm, longitudinal orientation) were tested at strain rate of 10 −3 s −1 at room temperature by a universal testing machine (capacity; 100 kN, model; Instron 8801, Instron Corp., Canton, MA, USA). A split Hopkinson tensile bar was used for dynamic tensile tests 26 , 48 50 , whose schematic diagram is presented in Supplementary Fig. S3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the studies on dynamic deformation of Fe-C-Mn-Al system steels were mainly focused on TRIP and TWIP steels [12][13][14][15]. Tang et al [12] studied the dynamic behavior of Fe-15Mn-3Al-0.23C TRIP/TWIP steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicated that the strain rate had no significant effect on the TRIP effect, and deformation twinning was the primary deformation mechanism with the increase of strain rate from 7 to 700 s −1 . Park et al [13] investigated the quasi-static and dynamic deformation mechanism of Fe-15Mn-1.2Al-0.6C TWIP steel. They demonstrated that the TWIP steel showed higher strength and similar ductility under dynamic loading because of the favorable effect of the increased planar slip and twinning on tensile properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%