2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.85.205302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quasiparticle band structure calculation of monolayer, bilayer, and bulk MoS2

Abstract: Quasiparticle self-consistent GW calculations of the band structures and related effective mass parameters are carried out for bulk, monolayer and bilayer MoS2. Including excitonic effects within the Mott-Wannier theory, quantitative agreement is obtained between the A, B excitons, measured by absorption (Phys. Rev. Lett. 105,136805 (2010)), and the calculated exciton gap energies at K. The A-B splitting arises from the valence band splitting which in the monolayer is entirely due to spin-orbit coupling and le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

99
967
3
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,273 publications
(1,073 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
99
967
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3,26,27 Our results indicate that the direct gap does not change appreciably between 3TL and bulk. Furthermore, our results corroborate recent calculations that predict direct band gaps near 2.8 eV or higher for 1 and 2TL.…”
Section: Resonance Effects On Main First-order Peaksmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…3,26,27 Our results indicate that the direct gap does not change appreciably between 3TL and bulk. Furthermore, our results corroborate recent calculations that predict direct band gaps near 2.8 eV or higher for 1 and 2TL.…”
Section: Resonance Effects On Main First-order Peaksmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Calculations have shown that the A and B excitons correspond to the expected energies of the gap energies at the K-point 130 , where the band splitting is due to spin-orbit coupling in monolayer MoS 2 (spin-orbit effects are described in more detail below). The calculations have also shown that the exciton binding energies are quite high owing to the decreased dielectric constants compared with the bulk, as well as the 2D confinement: about 0.897 eV for monolayer MoS 2 and 0.424 eV for bilayer 131 . We also note that in these calculations the transition energy of the excitons is offset by the exciton binding energy, and so the energy required to create an exciton would be much lower than the bandgap, and that the optical transition energies are not equivalent to the transport bandgap energies.…”
Section: Optoelectronicsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The electronic structure of group 6 TMD monolayers has been studied extensively. 10,11,13,[15][16][17]37 The valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) are located at the K point of the Brillouin zone (BZ) and are mostly contributed by the d orbitals of the transition metal atoms. 9 The large spin−orbit coupling splits the VBM into two states with a well-defined spin projection, S z , in the out-of-plane direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 We employ fully relativistic pseudopotentials and treat the sp semicore states of the transition metal atoms as valence electrons. 8,16 The quasiparticle bandstructures are computed using the GW approach as implemented in the Yambo code. 32 We employ the "one-shot" G 0 W 0 approximation, 26 a plasmonpole model for the dielectric function in the GW self-energy, cutoff energies of 60 and 10 Ry for the exchange and correlation parts of the GW self-energy, respectively, and up to 300 empty bands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%