2018
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aac9e4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qubit-nonlinear-oscillator systems: from the moderate-coupling limit to the ultrastrong-coupling regime

Abstract: This work aims to provide an alternative approach to modeling a two-state system (qubit) coupled to a nonlinear oscillator. Within a single algebraic scheme based upon the f-deformed oscillator description, hard and soft nonlinearities are proposed to be simulated by making use of fitting algebraic models extracted from the trigonometric and modified Pöschl-Teller potentials, respectively. In the regime where the strength of the coupling is considered to be moderate, this approach allows for an analytic, albei… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be understood as deformations of the usual Lie algebras giving rise to the concept of qp-deformed bosons. In quantum optics many authors have studied the q-deformed Jaynes-Cummings (JC) and Dicke models, which are obtained by replacing the usual creation and annihilation bosonic operators by their corresponding qp-deformed operators [9][10][11][12][13]. Different choices of the deformation function yield to different models and hence to new physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be understood as deformations of the usual Lie algebras giving rise to the concept of qp-deformed bosons. In quantum optics many authors have studied the q-deformed Jaynes-Cummings (JC) and Dicke models, which are obtained by replacing the usual creation and annihilation bosonic operators by their corresponding qp-deformed operators [9][10][11][12][13]. Different choices of the deformation function yield to different models and hence to new physics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%