‘Queen of Scots’: The monarch’s body and national identities in the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum

Abstract

On 20 September 2014, in the wake of the Scottish Independence Referendum, the pro-union, right-wing British broadsheet The Daily Telegraph’ s front page was dominated by a photograph of Queen Elizabeth II in the grounds of her Balmoral Estate in the Scottish Highlands, under the headline ‘Queen’s pledge to help reunite the Kingdom’. This article takes the headline as a departure point through which to explore competing discourses of national identity during the Independence Referendum. Understanding the Queen’s body as a site of symbolic struggle over these discourses, this article undertakes visual analysis to unpack the composition of the photograph, in order to understand its social, historical, political and cultural meanings. In so doing, it argues that the use of ‘Queen of Scots’ in The Daily Telegraph at the specific conjunctural moment of the Scottish Independence Referendum reveals the complex intersections between monarchy, power, (geo)politics, symbolism, sovereignty, national identity/identities and landscape in the United Kingdom.

The feminist politics of Meghan Markle: Brexit, femininity and the nation in crisis

“…A disdain for intellectual elites such as universities or ‘executives at the BBC’ is in line with the general anti-intellectual sensibility emblematic of populism in general and Brexit in particular (Clarke and Newman, 2017). This is also evident in the coverage of Markle, where academia as embodiment of expertise is often feminised and conflated with left-wing politics (Yelin and Clancy, 2020). Encapsulated by Leave campaigner and then-Secretary of State for Justice Michael Gove’s exclamation that ‘people in this country have had enough of experts’, the referendum campaign (and arguably the following political fall-out) prioritised emotions over expertise.…”

“…The reinvigoration of the royal family as ‘cool’ serves to mask this gap between wishful thinking and reality. Such a mobilisation of the royal family is not new, as the royal family has ‘helped to over-come internal social and geographical divisions’ (Ward, 2004: 22) in previous moments of crisis such as at the beginning of the Second World War or, more recently, during the Scottish Independence Referendum (Clancy, 2020). Markle plays a pivotal part in this construction, as her cosmopolitan and progressive identity offers a potentially corrective image to the increasing number of studies that attest to a rise in racism and xenophobia in the United Kingdom (see, for example, Fox, 2018; Gayle, 2018; Rzepnikowska, 2019).…”

“…Coinciding with the formal exit of the United Kingdom from the EU at the end of January 2020 and aptly termed ‘Megxit’, their decision to leave their fulltime royal roles and their move to North America was considered a result of relentless media scrutiny (Roy, 2020). What was considered largely positive media coverage of Markle, her feminism, and her role as a woman of colour in a White institution turned decidedly more negative after the royal wedding in May 2018 (Yelin and Clancy, 2020). However, as this article demonstrates, even in the presumed honeymoon phase leading up to the royal wedding, glimpses of what was to come were already evident.…”

“…This time frame captures mediations of Markle as the ‘new arrival’ before she becomes an established member of the royal family. The time frame covers a period before the inevitable backlash (Yelin and Clancy, 2020), in which Markle is decried as a ‘ruthless social climbing actress’ (Morgan, 2018) interested only in her own fame. The months leading up to the royal wedding then represent a moment in which Markle was mostly seen as a possible asset for the royal family, even though the coverage was often marked by racist othering (Weidhase, 2020).…”

Izkustveni svet: topografija interakcijskega prostora v turistični Šrilanki

“…Matere imperijev M oja prva študija primera se najprej vrne v zgodovino, k »materam« preteklih imperijev. Prek teh ženskih likov, ki jih imenujem »imperialne matere«, gre pa za zakonske sopotnice evropskih vladarjev (Clancy, 2020;Ganetz, 2016;Schulte, 2006), proučujem odnos med simbolnim materinstvom in nacionalizmom, ki je nasledil obdobje večnacionalnih imperijev. Ozrem se k dvema sovladaricama, najprej k Elizabeti, soprogi Franca Jožefa in kraljici Madžarske iz obdobja habsburške monarhije, in nato k Jovanki, soprogi Josipa Broza iz obdobja Socialistične federativne republike Jugoslavije.…”