Supercollider 4 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3454-9_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quench Performance of Fermilab/General Dynamics Built Full Length SSC Collider Dipole Magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Further, there appears to be a correlation between the decrease in quench current and the AC loss, as directly measured on some of the FNAL magnets. 25 In addition, as the ramp rate is increased, quench origin shifts from the pole turn, where the field is maximum, to the coil midplane, where the field is normal, to the wide face of the cable, producing the largest interstrand losses; this shift in location was predicted theoretically. In Figure 11, BNL magnets appear to be less sensitive than FNAL magnets.…”
Section: Ramp-ra Te Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…24 Further, there appears to be a correlation between the decrease in quench current and the AC loss, as directly measured on some of the FNAL magnets. 25 In addition, as the ramp rate is increased, quench origin shifts from the pole turn, where the field is maximum, to the coil midplane, where the field is normal, to the wide face of the cable, producing the largest interstrand losses; this shift in location was predicted theoretically. In Figure 11, BNL magnets appear to be less sensitive than FNAL magnets.…”
Section: Ramp-ra Te Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 82%