Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Testing Database Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1385269.1385277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Query-based test generation for database applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AGENDA tool [42], [43], [44], [45] is loosely related to the category-partition method and uses heuristics to fill the test database. Different criteria may be used to populate the databases.…”
Section: Testing Database Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AGENDA tool [42], [43], [44], [45] is loosely related to the category-partition method and uses heuristics to fill the test database. Different criteria may be used to populate the databases.…”
Section: Testing Database Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we discuss how to capture the desirable aggregate constraints on the result set returned for one or more specific queries issued from a database application. These constraints play a key role in testing database applications but previous work (Chays et al 2008;Deng and Chays 2005) on generating database states has often not taken them into account.…”
Section: Dealing With Aggregate Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the data created with those tools is often not meaningful for functional applications testing; rather, it is mostly used for application scaling tests. Chays et al propose the use of a test GENerator for Database Applications (AGENDA) [14,15,16], which generates database states based on the SQL statements used in the application and on the tester"s suggestions as captured in the input files. Specifically, the tester specifies sample values for the attributes that can be partitioned into groups, each of which are expected to cause the application to behave differently.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%