Questioning Public Participation in Social Media Activities in Indonesia

Sokowati, Muria Endah

doi:10.18196/jkm.112025

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Basically, when framing analysis is used, it is necessary to first examine how media construct a reality or afact. An attitude of support or not support, negative or positive, is just an effect and frame built by the media, not just a characteristic or actual situation such as what (Sokowati, 2019;Rawan et al, 2019).…”

Section: Framing Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Sahide,

Misran,

Maksum

2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The presidential election of the United States has always captured the world's attention. This is because America is a superpower in the global political arena. Therefore, the figure who is elected to occupy the White House has always impacted the global political scene for four years. Donald Trump, President of America 2017-2021, has had a tremendous impact on the global political scene with some controversial policies. Trump protectionism policies triggered the trade war between America and China, greatly impacting the global economy. This article looks at the sentiment of national media framing in Indonesia (Kompas, The Jakarta Post, and Republika) against the Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, which Trump lost to Joe Biden. In this research, the writer reads news related to the presidential election of the U.S. from September 2020 to November 2020 from the three national media outlets in Indonesia to see the framing. In this framing analysis, we wanted to determine whether the framing was positive, negative, or neutral when making news about Trump's figure. The results of this study indicate that the highest percentage of mainstream media framing in Indonesia is negative. Trump has been widely reported to have negative sentiment toward the media in Indonesia. News outlets with positive sentiment are the lowest against Trump. This means that the national media in Indonesia also does not like Trump's controversial leadership style.

show abstract

Section: Framing Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Sahide,

Misran,

Maksum

2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sejak maraknya penggunaan media sosial di Indonesia dalam sepuluh tahun ini, beberapa kasus menunjukkan bahwa media sosial telah berhasil mengakomodasi partisipasi masyarakat dalam masalah-masalah sosial, politik, ekonomi dan agama (Sokowati, 2019). Di satu sisi, para pengguna media sosial dapat membawa sisi positif yang berdampak di kehidupan nyata, namun di sisi yang lain mereka juga dapat menciptakan tindakan yang merusak kehidupan suatu masyarakat.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Prinsip-Prinsip Etika Kristiani Bermedia Sosial

Simon¹,

Lie²,

Komaling³

2021

Danum P. J. Teologi dan Mus. Gereja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesian netizens are often labeled as social media users at will without heeding politeness when interacting. This assessment is further confirmed by a survey conducted by Microsoft, that Medsos users are labeled as netizens with the worst politeness level for Southeast Asia scale. The predicate is certainly aimed at allreligius netizens without emphasizing certain beliefs. The low politeness indicates the lack of social media ethics applied by the people of the country. Ironically, Indonesia is known as areligius and civilized country, it seems invisible if you look at the behavior of netizens who are. The method used in this paper is descriptive qualitative method with a literature study approach. The description of this topic religion certainly teaches how politeness and politeness in the public space are displayed especially in social media, because politeness is an indikator we are called ethical or not. The principle of Christian ethics teaches that when using social media what a believer must do is not to do body shaming with other online media users, or not to comment racistically. Because God does not differentiate between fellow humans by loving one and not loving another just because humans are different physically, race or nation. The next principle of Christian ethics in social media is not to argue theologically and not to spit negative things. The goal is to avoid quarrels, let alone hate speech. Netizen Indonesia kerap di cap sebagai pengguna media sosial sesuka hati tanpa mengindahkan kesantunan ketika berinteraksi. Penilaian ini makin dipertegas melalui survei yang dilakukan oleh Microsoft, bahwa pengguna Medsos dilabeli sebagai netizen dengan tingkat kesopanan paling buruk untuk skala Asia Tenggara. Predikat itu tentu ditujukan kepada semua netizen yang beragama tanpa menitik-beratkan keyakinan tertentu. Rendahnya kesopanan menandakan kurangnya etika bermedia sosial diterapkan oleh masyarakat tanah air. Ironisnya, Indonesia yang di kenal sebagai negara yang religius dan beradab, hal itu seakan tidak terlihat bila melihat perilaku netizen yang bar-bar. Metode yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah metode kualitatif deskriftif dengan pendekatan studi kepustakaan. Uraian dari topik ini agama tentu mengajarkan bagaimana kesopanan dan kesantunan di ruang publik ditampilkan terlebih dalam bermedia sosial, karena kesopanan itu merupakan indikator kita di sebut beretika atau tidak. Prinsip etika Kristiani mengajarkan bahwa ketika bermedia sosial yang harus dilakukan orang Kristen adalah tidak melakukanbody shaming kesesama pengguna media online, maupun tidak berkomentar secara rasis. Karena Allah tidak membeda-bedakan sesama manusia dengan mengasihi yang satu dan tidak mengasihi yang lain hanya karena manusia itu berbeda secara fisik, ras atau bangsa. Prinsip etika Kristiani berikutnya dalam bermedia sosial adalah tidak berdebat secara teologis dan tidak mengumbar hal negatif. Tujuannya agar tidak terjadi pertengkaran apalagi ujaran kebencian.

show abstract

“…Their voices and expressions do not always indicate the involvement of the people in the political process. User noise cannot motivate individuals to solve problems or influence decision-making, implementation, or policy evaluation (Sokowati, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sentiments Analysis on Twitter Towards Hoax Information on Social Media News

Suherman,

Ferdi,

Maulana

et al. 2024

JIK

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hoaxes are a perilous byproduct of huge technology advancements, particularly the rise of social media. Using Twitter as an example, it is one of the most popular social media platforms for information sharing, communication, and entertainment. As a consequence, Twitter users may readily propagate fake or hoax information. The aim of this study is to find public opinion about hoaxes derived from Twitter user conversations around COVID-19. This study makes use of Twitter data obtained from Drone Emprit Academic. This study examined all processed tweets and surveyed public opinion on "Hoaks" (including mentions, retweets, and replies). The DEA engine analyzes the word frequency and mood of Twitter users to determine if a predominant emotion is good, negative, or neutral. According to the study results, netizens remarked on the COVID-19, alleging that the appearance of the Delta type variation was caused by the vaccination, not the virus. They do not regularly check facts owing to boredom, laziness, and reliance on just one source of information verification. Furthermore, only information that corresponds to their interests and needs will be approved. Thus, via discourse about Hoax, social media allows the formation of a platform for mutual understanding, sharing, and dynamically debating the meaning of demonstrations. This research provides a contribution to the disclosure of information about public opinion towards a discourse discussed on Twitter with the help of a DEA engine.

show abstract

Questioning Public Participation in Social Media Activities in Indonesia

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Indonesian media framing against Trump in the 2020 presidential election

Prinsip-Prinsip Etika Kristiani Bermedia Sosial

Sentiments Analysis on Twitter Towards Hoax Information on Social Media News

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About