Questions for Suicide Risk Assessment: There, Then and How to Measure?

Abstract

<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Background.</strong> Diagnostics of suicide risk is an important, but only developing domain in suicidology. <strong>Objective.</strong> This study aims to clarify the problems and perspectives in this scientific field. The main issues related to measuring this construct are posed and analyzed: the setting, the object of measurement, and the specifics of the available tools. <strong>Results</strong>. The inference is made about the importance of these variables when choosing a method for measuring suicide risk, as well as the need to combine diagnostics and therapy<strong>. Conclusion</strong>.The typology for choosing the methods of intervention based on the Narrative Crisis Model of Suicide by I. Galynker is provided. The limitations of the modern diagnostic methods are indicated, the call to rely not so much on various diagnostic tools as on the structured clinical judgment, and also be guided not so much by the presence or absence of suicidal ideation in a respondent, but by understanding their current frustrated needs.</p>

Suicide-Related Groups and School Shooting Fan Communities on Social Media: A Network Analysis

“…As a possible explanation, school shooting refers to a delinquent behavior, which is manifested in actions that harm society. Such a behavior is not typically common for people with suicidal ideations, as they have self-harming intentions or even conduct self-harming acts [42][43][44]. Although it is a simplification of the issue discussed, it may explain why followers of suicide-related communities were less interested in school shooting information on social media and did not subscribe to it.…”