2014
DOI: 10.1080/15326349.2014.930603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queues and Risk Processes with Dependencies

Abstract: Abstract:We study the generalization of the G/G/1 queue obtained by relaxing the assumption of independence between inter-arrival times and service requirements. The analysis is carried out for the class of multivariate matrix exponential distributions introduced in [12]. In this setting, we obtain the steady state waiting time distribution and we show that the classical relation between the steady state waiting time and the workload distributions remains valid when the independence assumption is relaxed. We a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has found a number of interesting applications across various fields. The advantage of working under phase-type distribution is that it allows some analytically tractable results in applications: e.g., in actuarial science (Rolski et al 1998, Albrecher and Asmussen 2010, Lin and Liu 2007, Lee and Lin 2010, option pricing (Asmussen et al 2004, Rolski et al 1998, queueing theory (Badila et al 2014, Chakravarthy and Neuts 2014, Buchholz et al 2014, Breuer and Baum 2005, Asmussen 2003, reliability theory (Assaf andLevikson 1982, Okamura andDohi 2015), and in survival analysis (Aalen 1995, Aalen andGjessing 2001). When jumps distribution of a compound Poisson process is modeled by phase-type distribution, it results in a dense class of Lévy processes, Asmussen et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has found a number of interesting applications across various fields. The advantage of working under phase-type distribution is that it allows some analytically tractable results in applications: e.g., in actuarial science (Rolski et al 1998, Albrecher and Asmussen 2010, Lin and Liu 2007, Lee and Lin 2010, option pricing (Asmussen et al 2004, Rolski et al 1998, queueing theory (Badila et al 2014, Chakravarthy and Neuts 2014, Buchholz et al 2014, Breuer and Baum 2005, Asmussen 2003, reliability theory (Assaf andLevikson 1982, Okamura andDohi 2015), and in survival analysis (Aalen 1995, Aalen andGjessing 2001). When jumps distribution of a compound Poisson process is modeled by phase-type distribution, it results in a dense class of Lévy processes, Asmussen et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach we take in this paper generalizes ideas in [5] and [6], and will allow us to extend those two studies. In Section 3 we derive a similar functional equation as in [6] for the survival function related to a 2-dimensional reserve process, but unlike [6] we do not assume that the claim intervals are exponentially distributed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such a correlation is quite natural; e.g., a claim event that generates very large claims could be subjected to additional administrative/regulatory delays. The type of correlation between the inter-arrival time and the vector of claim sizes is an extension to two dimensions of the dependence structure studied in [5] for a generalized Sparre-Andersen model. It involves making a rationality assumption regarding the trivariate LST of inter-arrival time and claim size vector (Assumption 2.1), which extends the case where the vector with the aforementioned components has a multivariate phase type distribution (MPH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in actuarial science (Rolski et al [31], Albrecher and Asmussen [7], Lin and Liu [25], Lee and Lin [24]), option pricing (Asmussen et al [5], Rolski et. al [31]), queueing theory (Badila et al [9], Chakravarthy and Neuts [13], Buchholz et al [12], Breuer and Baum [11], Asmussen [6]), reliability theory (Assaf and Levikson [8], Okamura and Dohi [30]), and in survival analysis (Aalen [3], Aalen and Gjessing [2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%