2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-011-9523-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queuing in space and time reduces the lek paradox on an antelope lek

Abstract: Lek systems, where females often use centrality to assess male quality, highlight a general paradox in evolutionary biology: how can female preferences for males providing good genes persist when consequential strong directional selection is predicted to deplete additive genetic variance in male quality and thereby obliterate benefits of choosiness? An explanation contributing to the resolution of this lek paradox may be that genetic variance is retained when an indirect mate choice cue, such as centrality on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females usually visit the lek and leave it soon after mating, whereas males stay and continue courtship toward other females (Apollonio et al, 2014). The most dominant male usually, but not always, occupies the central territory on the lek (Bro‐Jørgensen, 2011b; Isvaran & Jhala, 2000).…”
Section: Mating Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females usually visit the lek and leave it soon after mating, whereas males stay and continue courtship toward other females (Apollonio et al, 2014). The most dominant male usually, but not always, occupies the central territory on the lek (Bro‐Jørgensen, 2011b; Isvaran & Jhala, 2000).…”
Section: Mating Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most papers have applied standard linear models (e.g., [ 12 , 29 , 30 ]), mixed models to account for repeated observations (e.g. [ 31 , 32 ]), or Generalized Linear Models to manage non-normal distributions. Finally, a few papers have used different approaches, such as logistic regression [ 33 ], path analysis [ 34 ], and partial correlations [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%