2004
DOI: 10.1002/smj.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge

Abstract: We explore the link between a firm's organization of research -specifically, its choice to operate a centralized or decentralized R&D structure -and the type of innovation it produces. We propose that by reducing the internal transaction costs associated with R&D coordination across units, centralized R&D will generate innovations that have a larger and broader impact on subsequent technological evolution than will decentralized research. We also propose that, by facilitating more distant ('capabilities-broade… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
394
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(416 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
15
394
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Argyres and Silverman (2004) argue that centralizing R&D funding can be beneficial in that it minimizes ambiguity about a firm's R&D objectives. At TechMNC, product managers are not engineers or scientists; they are typically MBA graduates, responsible for providing strategic direction to the product development teams.…”
Section: Techmnc: Allocation Of Resources For Patentable Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argyres and Silverman (2004) argue that centralizing R&D funding can be beneficial in that it minimizes ambiguity about a firm's R&D objectives. At TechMNC, product managers are not engineers or scientists; they are typically MBA graduates, responsible for providing strategic direction to the product development teams.…”
Section: Techmnc: Allocation Of Resources For Patentable Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNA techniques have been widely adopted as one of the prevailing patent analysis tools [24]. In patent bibliometric analysis, citation and co-inventor information, which represent knowledge flows and inventive relationships among inventors, are suitable for formulating a network.…”
Section: Patent Co-inventor Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breadth is measured as the total number of technological classes in which a firm applied for patents, prior to the time window for the construction of the branching variable. Depth is the maximum number of patents in any one technological class as defined by the USPTO (Argyres and Silverman, 2004).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patent filing year, patent class, assignee names, number of sub-classes, and number of claims were used to construct our patent data. Whereas patents have been used to identify outcomes of R&D activities, patents have been also used extensively to capture the technological capabilities or portfolios (Argyres and Silverman, 2004;Sampson, 2005;Zheng, Liu and George, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%