2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0909740107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

R loops stimulate genetic instability of CTG·CAG repeats

Abstract: Transcription stimulates the genetic instability of trinucleotide repeat sequences. However, the mechanisms leading to transcriptiondependent repeat length variation are unclear. We demonstrate, using biochemical and genetic approaches, that the formation of stable RNA · DNA hybrids enhances the instability of CTG · CAG repeat tracts. In vitro transcribed CG-rich repeating sequences, unlike AT-rich repeats and nonrepeating sequences, form stable, ribonuclease A-resistant structures. These RNA · DNA hybrids are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
210
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
210
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is generally good agreement between results in our assay in human cells and those in mouse models (29)(30)(31). Among the 20 genes shown to affect CAG repeat contraction in human cells (6,27,28,31,32,37), six have been tested in a mouse model and also shown to modulate CAG repeat instability, including MSH2 (22,47,48), MSH3 (52), PMS2 (12), DNMT1 (6), CSB (20), and XPA (L. Hubert et al, unpublished data). Similarly, among those genes with little effect on CAG contraction in human cells (28), three have been tested in mouse models and shown to have little effect on CAG repeats, including MSH6 (52), XPC (8), and FEN1 (50,51).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…There is generally good agreement between results in our assay in human cells and those in mouse models (29)(30)(31). Among the 20 genes shown to affect CAG repeat contraction in human cells (6,27,28,31,32,37), six have been tested in a mouse model and also shown to modulate CAG repeat instability, including MSH2 (22,47,48), MSH3 (52), PMS2 (12), DNMT1 (6), CSB (20), and XPA (L. Hubert et al, unpublished data). Similarly, among those genes with little effect on CAG contraction in human cells (28), three have been tested in mouse models and shown to have little effect on CAG repeats, including MSH6 (52), XPC (8), and FEN1 (50,51).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Finally, our finding that GAA⅐TTC expansion preferentially occurs in the promoter distal end of a repeat in human cells (32) also supports this model. In the CNG repeat model, other structures may form that might include but are not limited to RNA⅐DNA hybrids (61,62). Regardless of the structure formed during transcription, the next step in our hypothesis is that a misalignment occurs during structure resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instability has been linked to atypical DNA secondary structures that are prone to erroneous replication or repair. 55,56 Also, the formation of R-loops enhances the instability of the (CAG)n repeat, 57 although it remains unclear how R-loops promote repeat instability. A recent study by Reddy et al suggests that R-loops play a role in repeat instability that is dependent on their processing by certain cellular factors.…”
Section: C9orf72 Repeat Expansion Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%