2015
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2015.1114571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race and gender effects on employer interest in job applicants: new evidence from a resume field experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite conducting the three correspondence audits during similar time periods with similar research questions and across many of the same cities, the findings regarding racial discrimination were quite different. Each chose different names to signal race, with one going the unique route of using generic or "white" first names coupled with "black" last names to signal a black applicant and found no evidence of racial discrimination (Darolia et al 2016). Although other differences between these studies exist, the possibility that the racial signal from names might influence correspondence audit outcomes warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite conducting the three correspondence audits during similar time periods with similar research questions and across many of the same cities, the findings regarding racial discrimination were quite different. Each chose different names to signal race, with one going the unique route of using generic or "white" first names coupled with "black" last names to signal a black applicant and found no evidence of racial discrimination (Darolia et al 2016). Although other differences between these studies exist, the possibility that the racial signal from names might influence correspondence audit outcomes warrants further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Differences in racial perceptions from names might explain differences in outcomes within and between correspondence audits. A recent trio of correspondence audits highlights this possibility (Darolia et al 2016;Deming et al 2016;Gaddis 2016). Three sets of researchers separately examined the effects of for-profit versus not-for-profit educational credentials in the labor market for black and white job candidates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Washington and Kelly also exemplify a common error, henceforth dubbed the "glass box" fallacy, which is inferring the specific character of cognitive information processing mechanisms on the basis of crude behavioral measures (which is to say they treat a "black box" as if its inner workings were transparent). They also overlook disconfirming evidence, such as a similarly run correlational study, which found no bias in hiring with respect to race [105]. 21 And as we have seen they are not unusual in this respect.…”
Section: Stereotype Threat and Curriculum Inclusivitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A recent trio of correspondence audits highlights this possibility (Deming et al 2016;Darolia et al 2016;Gaddis 2016). Three sets of researchers separately examined the effects of for-profit vs. not-for-profit educational credentials in the labor market for black and white job candidates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%