1974
DOI: 10.1080/03014467400000211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race and stature differences in the skeletal maturation of the hand and wrist

Abstract: Levels of maturity of 22 bones of the hand and wrist in children aged 5 to 10 years were compared by considering the differences between each bone-specific assessment (Greulich and Pyle, 1959) and the mean of all 22 bones. After elimination of the effects due to observer bias, atlas singularities, and age, comparisons were made by race (white, black, and Oriental) and stature. In all comparisons, distinct row or area effects were found, with some evidence of ray gradients also. The pattern differences between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this difference between African-Americans and European-Americans is verified, other ethnic and racial groups should be studied to see if possible underlying mechanisms can be identified. Race differences in the hands and wrists of children have been reported previously [36]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…If this difference between African-Americans and European-Americans is verified, other ethnic and racial groups should be studied to see if possible underlying mechanisms can be identified. Race differences in the hands and wrists of children have been reported previously [36]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[86] Moreover, almost half of the included studies (n = 23, 45.90%, n = 9777 AP left handwrist radiographs) were conducted on Caucasian children, whereas on the other hand, we found few studies carried out in African children (n = 8, 4.18%, n = 810 AO left wristcarpal radiographs). This imbalance may lead to interpretation biases because there is no homogeneous group to compare the precision or accuracy of every radiological method [87].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%