2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and race differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in human skeletons

Abstract: Background-Previous research has revealed that the ratios of the lengths of various pairs of human fingers differ in males and females.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the present results were on contrary to that of McFadden and Bracht 22 in European and African American populations, who stated that the right hand was slightly longer than the corresponding bones in the left hand, but the differences were small and there were numerous exceptions. Also Krishan et al 2 found that hand and foot dimensions were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in men in both right and left sides.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Also the present results were on contrary to that of McFadden and Bracht 22 in European and African American populations, who stated that the right hand was slightly longer than the corresponding bones in the left hand, but the differences were small and there were numerous exceptions. Also Krishan et al 2 found that hand and foot dimensions were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in men in both right and left sides.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Limited sample size (i.e., N  < 150; similar to our samples) definitely accounts for such failures to reach conventional significance criteria in null-hypothesis significance testing, even when the size of effects is as expected. Several prior studies of comparable research also yielded nominally not significant sex effects in 2D:4D derived from bone digit length [(19, 23, 38); exception (39)], whereas larger samples usually yield findings that are statistically significant, even when effect sizes are of similar size [ N  = 327 (10); N  = 1,060 (11); N  = 3,172 (12); N  = 250 (13)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, studies comprising several digit ratios derived from metacarpal-bone length have reported stronger sexual dimorphism occurring in digit ratios having digit 5 as one of the constituents of the ratio [in gorillas (18); in humans (19)]. In addition, studies have also reported a pattern of similar sexual dimorphism in digit ratios (2D:4D) derived from metacarpal and phalangeal bone lengths (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a possible effect of race on 2D:4D ratio (e.g., Manning, 2002;Manning, Stewart, Bundred, & Trivers, 2004;McFadden & Bracht, 2009), statistical analyses were conducted with and without controlling for race.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%