2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race-based biases in judgments of social pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meta-analyses suggested that biases in judgments of both threat and status were also associated with a tendency to prescribe more pain reliever to White versus Black targets. The latter link between status and treatment bias is in line with previous work suggesting that assumptions regarding status and toughness underpin racial bias in attributions of physical pain (Trawalter et al, 2012) and social pain (Deska, Kunstman, Bernstein, et al, 2020; Deska, Kunstman, Lloyd, et al, 2020). Moreover, it is possible that these perceptual and stereotype-based sources of biases in treatment may be differentially regulable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meta-analyses suggested that biases in judgments of both threat and status were also associated with a tendency to prescribe more pain reliever to White versus Black targets. The latter link between status and treatment bias is in line with previous work suggesting that assumptions regarding status and toughness underpin racial bias in attributions of physical pain (Trawalter et al, 2012) and social pain (Deska, Kunstman, Bernstein, et al, 2020; Deska, Kunstman, Lloyd, et al, 2020). Moreover, it is possible that these perceptual and stereotype-based sources of biases in treatment may be differentially regulable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In particular, Black patients are less likely to be screened for, diagnosed with, and treated for depression than their White counterparts (Hahm et al, 2015; Simpson et al, 2007; Stockdale et al, 2008). Recent findings link these disparities to race-based gaps in attributions of social pain (Deska, Kunstman, Bernstein, et al, 2020; Deska, Kunstman, Lloyd, et al, 2020). While research on the links between facial expressivity and disorders like depression remains mixed (e.g., Rottenberg & Vaughan, 2008), future work could begin to examine the perceptual underpinnings of racial disparities in mental health care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related bipartite conceptualization of dehumanization focuses on the tendency to overlook or deny others complex mental states, consisting of agency (capacity to think and act) and experience (capacity to feel [7,8]). For example, some socially stigmatized groups (e.g., Black Americans) are attributed less capacity to feel pain, with important consequences (e.g., racial bias in treatment recommendations [9,10]). Other work demonstrated dampened activation in brain regions central to social cognition when thinking about members of stigmatized groups [11] (see [12,13] for reviews).…”
Section: New Insights On Subtle Forms Of Dehumanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, bystanders may fail to adequately empathize with the experience of bullied peers (Martocci, 2019), may hold a higher threshold for what constitutes emotional pain for peers of some ethnoracial groups relative to others (Deska et al, 2020), may show more of a neural response upon witnessing a friend's social pain compared to a stranger's (Meyer et al, 2013), and may dissociate from bullied peers to avoid becoming victims of bullying themselves (Machackova et al, 2016;Salmivalli, 2001). In addition, the bystander effect illustrates that an individual's likelihood of helping decreases when there is a larger audience, whether in-person or online (Fischer et al, 2011;Machackova, 2016).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%