2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race/ethnicity and socio-economic differences in breast cancer surgery outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, several studies have suggested that Blacks suffer poorer outcomes in cancer survival due to delays, receipt, and adherence to cancer treatment (5164). For example, Akinyemiju et al (2015) performed a cross-sectional analysis among 71,156 women from the NIS and reported that Black women were 23% more likely to have metastatic breast cancer, but 6% less likely to receive mastectomy after breast cancer diagnosis (55). Likewise, much research has shown that Blacks have a higher risk of sepsis when compared to their White counterparts (24–26, 2933, 65, 66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, several studies have suggested that Blacks suffer poorer outcomes in cancer survival due to delays, receipt, and adherence to cancer treatment (5164). For example, Akinyemiju et al (2015) performed a cross-sectional analysis among 71,156 women from the NIS and reported that Black women were 23% more likely to have metastatic breast cancer, but 6% less likely to receive mastectomy after breast cancer diagnosis (55). Likewise, much research has shown that Blacks have a higher risk of sepsis when compared to their White counterparts (24–26, 2933, 65, 66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies have examined the influence of SES, at both the individual and area level, on breast cancer outcomes [4, 5, 7, 9, 19, 21], while a smaller number of studies have examined the influence of HCA on outcomes [4, 5]. However, very few studies have simultaneously accounted for HR subtypes, SES, and healthcare access at the area level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the causes of breast cancer outcome disparities have not been fully explained, and are likely multifactorial and pervasive across many levels including individual, community, provider, and health systems. The disparity is partly explained by differential access to high-quality screening and healthcare resources [4, 5], factors that operate at both individual and area levels and have been shown to influence stage at diagnosis and receipt of guideline-adherent treatment [6], and therefore survival [7]. Underlying biological differences in breast cancer between Black and White women may also be an underlying cause of disparities in outcomes, particularly in mortality rates [810], as Black women are more likely to be diagnosed with aggressive, hormone-receptor (HR)-negative subtypes [1017].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Advanced randomized researches prove purposefulness of early detection and constant monitoring of these disorders for timely overcoming of negative functional disorders and improvement of life quality of women of this nosology [4,5,8,9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, in most cases orientation on medical component of rehabilitation, working out of modern schemas of medicine provisioning, implementation of reconstructive plastic surgery, prevail.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%