2016
DOI: 10.35188/unu-wider/2016/188-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race, resources, and representation: Evidence from Brazilian politicians

Abstract: provides economic analysis and policy advice with the aim of promoting sustainable and equitable development. The Institute began operations in 1985 in Helsinki, Finland, as the first research and training centre of the United Nations University. Today it is a unique blend of think tank, research institute, and UN agency-providing a range of services from policy advice to governments as well as freely available original research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 These inequalities have narrowed to some extent since 2000, thanks in large part to the mobilization of Afro-Brazilian communities, yet racial inequalities in particular remain quite large (e.g., Andrews 2014; Salardi 2013). Moreover, there are very large gaps in women's and Afro-Brazilians' representation in elected office (Boas and Smith 2016;Bueno and Dunning 2014;Htun 2002;Jalalzai and dos Santos 2015). Inequalities may be especially large for two intersectionally defined groups: Afro-Brazilian women are disadvantaged in a great variety of outcomes and can be targets of police violence (Bernardino-Costa 2014; Marcondes et al 2013; Rezende and Lima 2004;Smith 2014), and racial disparities are larger among the middle to upper classes and those with a university education (Bailey et al 2013;Cacciamala and Hirata 2005;Osório 2008;Ribeiro 2006;Santos 2005;Telles 2004).…”
Section: Perceiving Race Class and Gender Discrimination In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 These inequalities have narrowed to some extent since 2000, thanks in large part to the mobilization of Afro-Brazilian communities, yet racial inequalities in particular remain quite large (e.g., Andrews 2014; Salardi 2013). Moreover, there are very large gaps in women's and Afro-Brazilians' representation in elected office (Boas and Smith 2016;Bueno and Dunning 2014;Htun 2002;Jalalzai and dos Santos 2015). Inequalities may be especially large for two intersectionally defined groups: Afro-Brazilian women are disadvantaged in a great variety of outcomes and can be targets of police violence (Bernardino-Costa 2014; Marcondes et al 2013; Rezende and Lima 2004;Smith 2014), and racial disparities are larger among the middle to upper classes and those with a university education (Bailey et al 2013;Cacciamala and Hirata 2005;Osório 2008;Ribeiro 2006;Santos 2005;Telles 2004).…”
Section: Perceiving Race Class and Gender Discrimination In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet there is considerable evidence that identity-based cleavages are not overtly salient in Brazil; that is, even though the country is regionally and racially heterogeneous, subnational origin and skin color are only weakly politicized at best. 5 With both the main electoral rules broadly stable and the main conventional social cleavages insufficiently politicized, we have to rule them out as potential causes for hyperfragmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I specify for the MatchIt function to use Mahalanobis distance, an 9. This measure has been used as a proxy by other authors, such as Bueno & Dunning (2017 alternative method to propensity score matching. I choose this method, as compared to propensity score matching, as the popular latter method has been shown to increase imbalance, inefficiency, model dependence, and bias (King & Nielson, 2019).…”
Section: Data and Research Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. This measure has been used as a proxy for socioeconomic status in past studies, for example seeBueno & Dunning (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%