2017
DOI: 10.15388/bjps.2016.5.10333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Race to the Eurozone: Why Latvia Joined Before Lithuania

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the drivers of the euro adoption in these countries was the intensity of geopolitical threats due to Russia's foreign policy. This argument was reflected in the public statements made by their policy makers [Vilpišauskas, 2014;Markevičiūtė and Kuokštis, 2016;Feldmann and Kuokštis, 2021] and reinforced by Russia's actions in Ukraine in 2014. As noted by Feldmann and Kuokštis [2021], in the Baltic states, the euro was seen as a mean to reduce the Russian threat by promoting deep integration with Western Europe, even though belonging to the common currency area was not associated with any explicit security guarantees such as those provided by NATO membership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the drivers of the euro adoption in these countries was the intensity of geopolitical threats due to Russia's foreign policy. This argument was reflected in the public statements made by their policy makers [Vilpišauskas, 2014;Markevičiūtė and Kuokštis, 2016;Feldmann and Kuokštis, 2021] and reinforced by Russia's actions in Ukraine in 2014. As noted by Feldmann and Kuokštis [2021], in the Baltic states, the euro was seen as a mean to reduce the Russian threat by promoting deep integration with Western Europe, even though belonging to the common currency area was not associated with any explicit security guarantees such as those provided by NATO membership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other major macroeconomic news was occurring around the same time (in particular the Greek elections on January 25 and the initiation of the ECB's version of quantitative easing), they were also related directly to the expansion of the euro area; such increased volatility was thus perhaps signaling that markets were not so sanguine about adding another, poorer country to the mix at a time of already-heightened uncertainty. 1 Additionally, the time to joining the euro from the announcement of joining in Lithuania's case was one of the shortest on record (July 23, 2014, to January 1, 2015)perhaps a consequence of the earlier failed attempt to join the euro in 2007 (Markevičiūtė & Kuokštis, 2016) meaning that euro area markets may not have had time to process the information (Eurobarometer, 2015). Given Lithuania's long history of attempting to joining the euro-area and failing, it is likely that Lithuania finally fulfilling its accession criteria also may have been somewhat of a surprise (Backé & Dvorsky, 2018).…”
Section: H2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In April 2012, the populations of Latvia and Lithuania were nearly evenly divided between those who were ‘very much’ or ‘rather in favour’ and those who were ‘very much’ or ‘rather against’ euro adoption, while elites favoured the euro nearly unanimously. Asked about the timeframe of euro adoption, only fourteen per cent of Lithuanians and nine per cent of Latvians wanted to adopt the euro ‘as soon as possible’ (Markevičiūtė and Kuokštis : 15). These figures are not surprising, because indigenous Baltic populations accepted hardships of internal devaluation not to accelerate the adoption of euro but to save their national currencies from degradation to the likes of rouble.…”
Section: The Paradoxical Demise Of Baltic Monetary Nationalism and Itmentioning
confidence: 99%