2009
DOI: 10.1080/15299730802488452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Dissociation: An Examination of the Dissociative Experiences Scale in a Nonclinical Population

Abstract: The present study sought to examine normative dissociation within a racially and ethnically diverse nonclinical sample. In all, 317 undergraduates, including 190 Whites and 127 racial/ethnic minorities from a large research university participated in the current study. Results indicated differences in dissociation as a function of race: African and Asian Americans reported significantly higher rates of dissociation compared to Whites. There were no differences in psychological adjustment indicators as a functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous research (Douglas, 2009), Asian participants scored higher on dissociation than did white participants ( M = 2.33 [ SD = 1.65] versus M = 1.61 [ SD = 1.35], p < .05 for Asian and white participants, respectively). Age was uncorrelated with dissociation ( r = −.02, ns ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous research (Douglas, 2009), Asian participants scored higher on dissociation than did white participants ( M = 2.33 [ SD = 1.65] versus M = 1.61 [ SD = 1.35], p < .05 for Asian and white participants, respectively). Age was uncorrelated with dissociation ( r = −.02, ns ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Men and women did not differ on dissociation (M 5 2.15 [SD 5 1.57] vs. M 5 1.76 [SD 5 1.48], ns, for men and women, respectively). Consistent with previous research (Douglas, 2009), Asian participants scored higher on dissociation than did White participants (M 5 2.33 [SD 5 1.65] vs. M 5 1.61 [SD 5 1.35], po.05, for Asian and White participants, respectively). Age was uncorrelated with dissociation (r 5 À .02, ns).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, we did not examine differences in demographics or constructs based on recruitment samples -it is possible this was a confound; however, the demographics for age and education suggest that this was a fairly representative sample for young metropolitan females. Dissociation has been found to vary (Douglas, 2009), and while this sample was multi-ethnic, the number of participants in most of the ethnic groups was too small to allow for meaningful statistical analyses. Therefore, we did not run separate analyses for each group; instead, we used the total sample for all analyses.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nonclinical young adults have reported Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES; Bernstein & Putnam, 1986) mean scores ranging from approximately 14 to 23 (Douglas, 2009;Gleaves, Eberenz, Warner, & Fine, 1995;Lorber et al, 2007;Martiñez-Taboas & Bernal, 2000); mean scores ranging from 15 to more than 30 have been reported in young adults with trauma histories (e.g., Nagata, Kiriike, Iketani, Kawarada, & Tanaka, 1999;Zelikovsky & Lynn, 2002). In many cases, these scores have been higher than those found in older traumatized samples, indicating that dissociation is inversely related to age (e.g., Dorahy, Lewis, Millar, & Lee, 2003;Goldberg, 1999;Putnam, 1996;Vanderlinden, Varga, Peuskens, & Pieters, 1995).…”
Section: Abstract Dissociative Disorders Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%