2002
DOI: 10.2307/1123661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Racing towards the Top?: The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
271
4
14

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 879 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
15
271
4
14
Order By: Relevance
“…These differences are attributable to both "innate" differences in the firms and the likely perceived benefits of cross-listing. See Coffee (2002) for a more thorough discussion of the literature examining the effects of cross-listing. 56 The data supporting these statistics comes from http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/releases/corpsecure/ current.htm.…”
Section: The Role Of Financial Accounting In Debt Contractingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences are attributable to both "innate" differences in the firms and the likely perceived benefits of cross-listing. See Coffee (2002) for a more thorough discussion of the literature examining the effects of cross-listing. 56 The data supporting these statistics comes from http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/releases/corpsecure/ current.htm.…”
Section: The Role Of Financial Accounting In Debt Contractingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demirguc-Kunt and Maksimovic (1998) utilize the International Company Risk Guide's Law and Order indicators of the effectiveness of a country's legal system rather than those employed by La Porta, et al (1998 to show that countries with appropriate legal systems offer greater protection of long-term external financing and are able to grow faster. Scholars have observed that AngloSaxon legal systems do appear to provide stronger protection for shareholder rights (Coffee, 2002), and that financing activity is significantly reduced in countries with poor investor protection systems. Subsequent research lends support to these observations (Lins, Strickland and Zenner, 2004;Reese and Weisbach, 2002).…”
Section: Legal Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some legal scholars suggest foreign firms that engage in the process of listing on U.S. stock exchanges commit themselves to respect minority investor rights and to provide fuller disclosure (Coffee, 2002). However, the legal environment surrounding foreign new issues is especially salient to investors in the U.S. and U.K. markets because it relates not only to minority investor rights, but also in the ability of investors to sue and enforce a legal judgment to recover all or a sizable portion of their investments.…”
Section: Legal Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical analysis of Hovey (2005b) found that generally offshore ownership has a positive influence on performance, although the results were not as compelling as might have been intuitively expected. According to theory (Merton, 1987;Coffee, 2002;Faff, Hodgson, & Saudagaran, 2002;Lang et. al., 2003;Moffett, Stonehill, & Eiteman, 2003), it is expected that firms that cross-list on Hong Kong or New York stock exchanges, would have superior performance due to improved disclosure and monitoring, and ultimately enhanced value.…”
Section: Offshore Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%